SHAPING THE FUTURE HOW CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS CAN POWER HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
23XELCz
23XELCz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
BOX 3.5:<br />
Benchmarking universities globally<br />
Higher education increasingly became a global<br />
market in the 1990s, and universities are now<br />
subject to global rankings. The best known are<br />
the Shanghai Jiaotong University and the Times<br />
Higher Education rankings, which apply criteria<br />
involving teaching, research, knowledge transfer<br />
and international outlook. While there are many<br />
critiques of these rankings, they appear set to<br />
stay, underlining that universities in Asia-Pacific<br />
will have to compete to attract the best students<br />
and best-qualified faculty from across the world.<br />
The poor performance of universities in South and<br />
South-east Asia is not surprising. Higher education<br />
institutions in Asia-Pacific as a whole, including the<br />
famed Indian Institutes of Technology, have primarily<br />
been teaching centres. Only recently have some<br />
begun to focus more on research. Most universities<br />
in the region do not have separate categories of<br />
teaching and research staff. Attempts to improve<br />
higher education have been characterized by overregulation,<br />
which has proved counterproductive,<br />
particularly in terms of innovation.<br />
The 2014-2015 Times Higher Education rankings<br />
showed that the United States dominates in the<br />
best higher education institutions, with 74 institutions<br />
in the top 200. The United Kingdom ranks<br />
second with 29, Germany third with 12 and the<br />
Netherlands fourth with 11. North America and<br />
Europe together account for 167 universities in the<br />
top 200. Though almost half of the world’s higher<br />
education students are located in Asia-Pacific, the<br />
region is struggling to gain high rankings. Only a<br />
few countries in the region have universities in the<br />
top 200 category: Australia with 8; Japan with 5;<br />
the Republic of Korea with 4; Hong Kong, China<br />
(SAR) with 4; China with 3; Singapore with 2 and<br />
New Zealand with 1.<br />
Poor quality in higher education propels many<br />
young people to study elsewhere. Students from<br />
Asia comprise a significant proportion of the total<br />
international student body in North America,<br />
Europe and Oceania. Some universities from<br />
developed countries, including Australia, Canada,<br />
the United Kingdom and the United States, are<br />
increasingly establishing foreign branch campuses<br />
in Asian developing countries. The aim is to provide<br />
access to Asian students who otherwise may not<br />
be able to afford an overseas study experience.<br />
Sources: Welch 2011.<br />
urgent investment, this situation may worsen,<br />
as the middle class expands from 525 million in<br />
2009 to 3.2 billion in 2030. 29 With many able<br />
to pay for education, they may increasingly look<br />
to private institutions, as is already happening.<br />
Another driver of demand will be the need to<br />
boost productivity, given ageing populations.<br />
These issues will require transformational change<br />
in tertiary education at a pace and scale never<br />
seen before (Box 3.5).<br />
Beyond access, there are issues of affordability,<br />
quality and accountability in higher<br />
education. Expansion has been uneven and<br />
inconsistently regulated, boosting accessibility,<br />
but not necessarily excellence or equity. The<br />
quality of learning, teaching, research and innovation<br />
have not kept pace in general, even as<br />
some Asia-Pacific countries top global higher<br />
education rankings. In many Asia-Pacific countries,<br />
rapid expansion of enrolment in combination<br />
with budget constraints has resulted in an<br />
increase in student-faculty ratios and erosion of<br />
the quality of library and laboratory facilities.<br />
Consequently, the quality of higher education<br />
has declined. 30<br />
YOUTH ILLITERACY REMAINS<br />
AN OBSTACLE<br />
The global number of illiterate young people<br />
declined from 139 million in 1999 to 126 million<br />
in 2012, but youth illiteracy is quite widespread<br />
in the region (Table 3.9). Around 175 million<br />
young people in low- and lower-middle-income<br />
countries—around a quarter of the youth population—cannot<br />
read all or part of a sentence,<br />
implying they are functionally illiterate. 31 Among<br />
illiterate youth, young women comprise 61<br />
percent (Table 3.15).<br />
Literacy rates for youth aged 15 to 24 have<br />
improved everywhere; globally, the rate increased<br />
from 87 percent to 90 percent in the last decade.<br />
The future of<br />
the region depends<br />
on eliminating<br />
youth illiteracy and<br />
associated gender<br />
disparities<br />
93