26.04.2016 Views

SHAPING THE FUTURE HOW CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS CAN POWER HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

23XELCz

23XELCz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pensions are<br />

important guarantees<br />

of income security<br />

and well-being for<br />

the elderly<br />

130<br />

BOX 4.4:<br />

Attaining universal health-care coverage for<br />

older people in the Philippines<br />

Since 2014, all citizens aged 60 and above<br />

in the Philippines have had automatic healthcare<br />

coverage through the government-owned<br />

Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (Phil-<br />

Health). It now covers over 6 million older<br />

people.<br />

The Government established PhilHealth as part<br />

of a drive for universal health care. The corporation<br />

also administers the National Health<br />

Insurance Programme, which provides basic<br />

health coverage and quality health services for<br />

all Filipinos. In recent years, it has expanded<br />

benefits to cover specific groups such as<br />

people with disabilities. As of December 2013,<br />

PhilHealth covered 76.9 million Filipinos.<br />

Contributing to the PhilHealth fund is mandatory<br />

for all Filipino workers employed by private<br />

businesses and the Government as well as<br />

those employed overseas. People aged 60 and<br />

above who are working and earning more than<br />

the poverty threshold of income also contribute,<br />

helping make universal coverage feasible.<br />

Source: Philippines Health Corporation 2014.<br />

persons. For example, Thailand has established<br />

elderly clubs in all provinces that encourage selfcare<br />

and social participation. Very few countries<br />

have tackled disabilities or HIV among older<br />

people, although the Republic of Korea has<br />

established a community-based rehabilitation<br />

system for older people with disabilities. 53<br />

PENSION SYSTEMS STRUGGLE<br />

TO KEEP UP<br />

Pensions are important guarantees of income<br />

security and well-being for the elderly. Amid rapid<br />

population ageing in Asia-Pacific, countries<br />

need to make sure that public pension systems<br />

are designed to meet the needs of older people,<br />

and provide them with sufficient resources to<br />

live a life of dignity. Because social pensions<br />

entail public money, they invoke issues related<br />

to budget priorities, coverage, adequacy and sustainability.<br />

These in turn are framed by human<br />

rights principles inherent to human well-being,<br />

and the need to steer the economy on a steady<br />

course by protecting against fiscal deficits.<br />

Given relatively rapid development, public<br />

pension systems in Asia-Pacific tend to be fragmented<br />

and complex, not having had time to<br />

evolve into more integrated and mature systems.<br />

In one of the region’s most advanced countries,<br />

the Republic of Korea, a pension system was<br />

only created in 1988. In China, the basic oldage<br />

insurance programme for non-public sector<br />

employees was established mainly in 1997 (Box<br />

4.5). In Indonesia, it was only in 2004 that a<br />

law was enacted to establish a comprehensive<br />

social security programme. 54<br />

According to the World Bank classification,<br />

pensions can be put into five pillars. Pillar 0 characterizes<br />

social pension that is typically funded<br />

from the national revenue to ensure minimum<br />

income security at old age and combat poverty.<br />

These programs are non-contributory in nature<br />

and could be targeted towards some specific<br />

groups or be universal, depending upon budget<br />

availability. Pillar 1 involves mandatory publicly<br />

managed schemes including defined benefits<br />

where the amount of pension is connected to<br />

individual earnings and defined-contribution<br />

scheme where individuals also contribute to the<br />

pension. Pillar 2 characterizes privately managed<br />

mandatory savings with various investment options,<br />

while Pillar 3 consists of privately managed<br />

voluntary savings. The final Pillar constitutes of<br />

non-financial assets including home-ownership,<br />

non-cash savings, and family support. 55<br />

Most Asia-Pacific countries have contributory<br />

pension schemes, either a defined benefit or<br />

defined contribution scheme, or a combination of<br />

the two (Table 4.2). Contributory systems cover<br />

only a small segment of the population, however,<br />

mainly public servants and employees in the<br />

formal sector. Even for employees in the latter,<br />

programmes are often broken down by type of<br />

employment, public or private, and sometimes<br />

by social status, such as whether someone is a<br />

migrant or not.<br />

Both defined benefit and defined contribution<br />

systems are inherently inequitable, in that<br />

they are available only to some people, generally<br />

those with better employment and more means.<br />

With defined contribution systems, which require<br />

employee contributions, the poor and lower<br />

cadre staff may not be able to make adequate<br />

contributions, which could deprive them of an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!