SHAPING THE FUTURE HOW CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS CAN POWER HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
23XELCz
23XELCz
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
160<br />
Social, cultural and<br />
economic incentives<br />
drive migration<br />
to urban areas<br />
1995 to 2010.<br />
In the region’s middle-income countries, the<br />
share of the population above age 60 is growing<br />
in both rural and urban areas. In Thailand, for<br />
example, it increased from 9 percent to 12 percent<br />
in urban areas and from 10 percent to 13<br />
percent in rural areas between 2000 and 2010.<br />
While there is not yet a significant difference<br />
between rural and urban areas in middle-income<br />
countries, rural populations are slightly older.<br />
Asia-Pacific’s lower-income countries are in<br />
general still the youngest overall.<br />
In recent years, growth in the shares of urban<br />
working-age people have been most pronounced<br />
in lower-income countries. In Nepal, for example,<br />
the share increased from 59 percent to 65<br />
percent from 1996 to 2010, and in Cambodia<br />
it went from 58 percent to 70 percent. 13 In both<br />
countries, shares of working-age people in rural<br />
areas also went up, but more slowly and from<br />
a lower level. In 2010, the working-age population<br />
accounted for 55 percent of people in<br />
rural Nepal and 61 percent in rural Cambodia.<br />
Middle-income countries are also experiencing<br />
a shift to higher shares of working-age people<br />
in cities. In Indonesia, for example, the share<br />
rose from 63 percent to 66 percent from 1995<br />
to 2010, while the rural share went from 57<br />
percent to 61 percent.<br />
Many countries have sizable urban young<br />
populations. People below age 14 make up<br />
30 percent or more of urban residents in Afghanistan,<br />
Bangladesh, Bhutan, Lao People’s<br />
Democratic Republic, Pakistan, Solomon Islands<br />
and Timor-Leste. Their share is more than 20<br />
percent in most countries with data available,<br />
with the exception of China, Japan and the<br />
Republic of Korea.<br />
MAKING <strong>THE</strong> CHOICE TO MIGRATE<br />
The decision to migrate from a rural community<br />
to a city is a complex one, 14 driven by a mix of<br />
economic, social and political factors. Across<br />
Asia-Pacific, people move in search of better<br />
education, work and services, to escape climate<br />
risks and environmental damages, and to discover<br />
new social, political or cultural opportunities.<br />
Conditions in both rural and urban areas<br />
influence the reason to move. Many rural areas<br />
are characterized by poor education, declining<br />
FIGURE 5.8:<br />
The urban-rural gap in services<br />
such as electricity, particularly in less<br />
developed countries, can be wide<br />
Note: Data are for 2012.<br />
Source: Based on World Bank 2015a.<br />
agricultural productivity, low incomes from<br />
farming and few opportunities for off-farm<br />
rural employment. A pool of surplus labourers<br />
has been left in search of new options, with<br />
urban centres seen by many as offering more<br />
and better jobs, across a range of occupations,<br />
and for higher wages. Some urban areas are<br />
home to labour-intensive manufacturing and<br />
export-oriented industries that have been significant<br />
employers of migrant labour, as in Bangladesh,<br />
Cambodia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and<br />
Viet Nam. 15 Remittances from migrant labour<br />
now comprise a large share of rural household<br />
income in many Asia-Pacific countries. 16<br />
Big gaps in basic services also send rural<br />
people to cities (Figure 5.8). In Cambodia, 90<br />
percent of urban residents have consistent access<br />
to electricity; less than 20 percent of rural<br />
dwellers do. In Nepal, migrants often choose<br />
destinations based on access to schools and hospi-