23.09.2016 Views

Future of an Ageing Population

gs-16-10-future-of-an-ageing-population

gs-16-10-future-of-an-ageing-population

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Future</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>Ageing</strong> <strong>Population</strong> | Health <strong>an</strong>d Care Systems<br />

A joined-up approach between health <strong>an</strong>d social care provision is required to<br />

make progress in this area.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, (including those in healthcare), patients, service users,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d carers will also need to be able to operate technologies. Healthcare<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals have had mixed reactions to technological adv<strong>an</strong>ces such as<br />

e-prescribing <strong>an</strong>d computerised physici<strong>an</strong> order entry, expressing worries that<br />

these new systems may disrupt pr<strong>of</strong>essional routines <strong>an</strong>d increase workload 196 .<br />

A technology which has been successfully demonstrated with one patient<br />

group will not necessarily work for other groups or in different regulatory<br />

environments. People with higher incomes are likely to be healthier <strong>an</strong>d to<br />

own <strong>an</strong>d use new technologies. Given this, there is a risk that the potential <strong>of</strong><br />

technologies to support health will not tr<strong>an</strong>slate to those with highest need,<br />

exacerbating existing health inequalities.<br />

Policy Implication<br />

New <strong>an</strong>d emerging technologies have the potential to ch<strong>an</strong>ge care in the<br />

home <strong>an</strong>d community. Capitalising on the opportunity this <strong>of</strong>fers will me<strong>an</strong><br />

addressing barriers <strong>an</strong>d being sensitive to public concerns around privacy.<br />

International case study: Long-term care insur<strong>an</strong>ce in<br />

Germ<strong>an</strong>y <strong>an</strong>d Jap<strong>an</strong><br />

Compulsory long-term care insur<strong>an</strong>ce was implemented in Germ<strong>an</strong>y in<br />

1995, initially to protect against the fin<strong>an</strong>cial hardships associated with<br />

disability <strong>an</strong>d chronic illness. Later reforms included the introduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> long-term care for dementia patients, earnings replacement for up<br />

to 10 days <strong>of</strong> acute family care, <strong>an</strong>d rehabilitation benefits to avoid or<br />

delay the need for long-term care 197 .<br />

Long-term care insur<strong>an</strong>ce is a compulsory ‘pay-as-you-go’ system<br />

with contributions, based on salary, split equally between employer<br />

<strong>an</strong>d employee. To compensate employers for the additional cost, one<br />

public holiday was declared as a working day. Contribution rate was<br />

initially 1% <strong>of</strong> salary in 1995 but has increased over the years to 2.35%<br />

in 2015. Childless employees over 23 pay <strong>an</strong> extra 0.25% 198 .<br />

Anyone with a physical or mental illness or disability, who has made<br />

contributions for at least two years (reduced from five years in 2008),<br />

P86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!