Future of an Ageing Population
gs-16-10-future-of-an-ageing-population
gs-16-10-future-of-an-ageing-population
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Future</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> <strong>Ageing</strong> <strong>Population</strong> | Health <strong>an</strong>d Care Systems<br />
A joined-up approach between health <strong>an</strong>d social care provision is required to<br />
make progress in this area.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, (including those in healthcare), patients, service users,<br />
<strong>an</strong>d carers will also need to be able to operate technologies. Healthcare<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals have had mixed reactions to technological adv<strong>an</strong>ces such as<br />
e-prescribing <strong>an</strong>d computerised physici<strong>an</strong> order entry, expressing worries that<br />
these new systems may disrupt pr<strong>of</strong>essional routines <strong>an</strong>d increase workload 196 .<br />
A technology which has been successfully demonstrated with one patient<br />
group will not necessarily work for other groups or in different regulatory<br />
environments. People with higher incomes are likely to be healthier <strong>an</strong>d to<br />
own <strong>an</strong>d use new technologies. Given this, there is a risk that the potential <strong>of</strong><br />
technologies to support health will not tr<strong>an</strong>slate to those with highest need,<br />
exacerbating existing health inequalities.<br />
Policy Implication<br />
New <strong>an</strong>d emerging technologies have the potential to ch<strong>an</strong>ge care in the<br />
home <strong>an</strong>d community. Capitalising on the opportunity this <strong>of</strong>fers will me<strong>an</strong><br />
addressing barriers <strong>an</strong>d being sensitive to public concerns around privacy.<br />
International case study: Long-term care insur<strong>an</strong>ce in<br />
Germ<strong>an</strong>y <strong>an</strong>d Jap<strong>an</strong><br />
Compulsory long-term care insur<strong>an</strong>ce was implemented in Germ<strong>an</strong>y in<br />
1995, initially to protect against the fin<strong>an</strong>cial hardships associated with<br />
disability <strong>an</strong>d chronic illness. Later reforms included the introduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> long-term care for dementia patients, earnings replacement for up<br />
to 10 days <strong>of</strong> acute family care, <strong>an</strong>d rehabilitation benefits to avoid or<br />
delay the need for long-term care 197 .<br />
Long-term care insur<strong>an</strong>ce is a compulsory ‘pay-as-you-go’ system<br />
with contributions, based on salary, split equally between employer<br />
<strong>an</strong>d employee. To compensate employers for the additional cost, one<br />
public holiday was declared as a working day. Contribution rate was<br />
initially 1% <strong>of</strong> salary in 1995 but has increased over the years to 2.35%<br />
in 2015. Childless employees over 23 pay <strong>an</strong> extra 0.25% 198 .<br />
Anyone with a physical or mental illness or disability, who has made<br />
contributions for at least two years (reduced from five years in 2008),<br />
P86