11.12.2012 Views

art-e-conomy _ reader - marko stamenkovic

art-e-conomy _ reader - marko stamenkovic

art-e-conomy _ reader - marko stamenkovic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

162<br />

Saskia SASSEN<br />

E<strong>conomy</strong> and Art Today:<br />

Design as Blurring Mediation/<br />

Art as Intervention[1]<br />

The world of work today increasingly blurs the distinction between creative work<br />

and economic activity/commodity production. The ascendance of design as a key<br />

feature in a growing number of sectors captures this well. Much of this design is<br />

corporate. This is so even when in it is produced by small firms with highly creative<br />

designers: it still runs through the market, adding utility --profitability-- to the object<br />

or process.<br />

Here I want to examine briefly the conditions in our political e<strong>conomy</strong> that have<br />

led to this growing importance of design as a type a profit-adding creative work. The<br />

capacity of design to add profitability can reposition creative work in circuits that<br />

are now central to the e<strong>conomy</strong>, including the global e<strong>conomy</strong>. Secondly, I want to<br />

identify domains that can escape this commercialized design practice and bring <strong>art</strong><br />

and <strong>art</strong>ists into spaces now increasingly taken over by design.<br />

The ascendance of process and flow:<br />

A greater need for intermediaries<br />

In addressing these issues I distinguish three conditions in today’s political<br />

e<strong>conomy</strong> within which it might be helpful to situate this ascendance of design as the<br />

blurring between <strong>art</strong>istic work/practice and profit-making work, or as a mediation<br />

that blurs that distinction. One is the ascendance of process and flow and networks<br />

over than final product per se. This raises the importance of intermediary actors and<br />

interventions. I think of designers in this regard as intermediaries. A second is that<br />

globalization unsettles existing arrangements and boundaries, and does so with<br />

great velocity. This raises the importance of narrating that unsettlement, and at the<br />

limit making it attractive rather than something to avoid. Here I think of designers<br />

as narrators. This unsettlement and the push to innovate leads to a sharp increase<br />

in new products, systems, configurations. This raises the importance of giving them<br />

form, shape.[2]<br />

Seen through these three lenses, design is an intervention that bridges the<br />

subjective and material world by bridging global corporate growth strategies and<br />

place-bound consumer needs. Corporate branding is a key tool. Fashion bridges<br />

the human body and the world of clothing. Architecture and urban design bridge<br />

individuals and public space. Much of this bridging can be inspired, witty, brilliant,<br />

evincing great talent.[3]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!