2007_6_Nr6_EEMJ
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Robu et al. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 6 (<strong>2007</strong>), 6, 573-592<br />
It is very important to identify the risk and to<br />
estimate it in order to be analyzed. The risk analyzing<br />
process tries to identify all the results of an action.<br />
The risk estimation is done using the analytic<br />
methods or simulation. There are estimated thus the<br />
occurrence probability of every disaster, as well as<br />
the associated magnitude (dimension). The risk<br />
analysis process uses technical information related to<br />
estimations and other additional available<br />
information, for assessing diverse variants of possible<br />
actions. An original model based on multiple criteria<br />
optimization to appropriate financial funds for<br />
atmospheric pollution reduction is presented. For this<br />
model, the solving manner is specified by reduction<br />
to an optimization problem with a single objective<br />
function (Radulescu, 2002).<br />
5.1. Measures for calculus of the risk value<br />
The probability theory offers many adequate<br />
tools for modeling the risk phenomenon. Any activity<br />
exhibits an incertitude element. From mathematical<br />
point of view, the incertitude will be modeled using<br />
random variables or, more generally, using the<br />
stochastic processes. The risk that appears within an<br />
activity may be described with adequate measures.<br />
One of the most used measures is the dispersion of<br />
the random variable, which describes the incertitude<br />
of the respective activity. Another measure of the risk<br />
is given by the repartition function of the random<br />
variable. More precisely, if X is a random variable<br />
that describes the risk associated to a decision, F x is<br />
the repartition function associated to variable X, and f x<br />
is the probability density of the random variable X,<br />
then using Eq. (2):<br />
+∞<br />
∫<br />
−∞<br />
µ = E(X ) = xdF ( x)<br />
, (2)<br />
the risk measures result from Eqs. (3, 4):<br />
+∞<br />
∫ (<br />
−∞<br />
2<br />
2<br />
σ = var( X ) = x − µ ) dF ( x)<br />
(3)<br />
+∞<br />
1/ 2<br />
⎤<br />
2<br />
( x − µ ) dFx<br />
( x)<br />
⎥<br />
−∞<br />
⎦<br />
⎡<br />
σ = ⎢ ∫<br />
(4)<br />
⎣<br />
A measure of the risk may be considered also:<br />
+∞<br />
∫<br />
−∞<br />
| x − µ | dF ( x)<br />
(first order central moment) (5)<br />
x<br />
Stone has shown that all the measures of the<br />
risks above presented are special cases of some<br />
families of risks measures. The first measure of the<br />
risk within the Stone risk measures family that has<br />
three parameters is defined as (Eqs.2-6):<br />
x<br />
q<br />
( F x )<br />
| (k>0 (6)<br />
∫<br />
−∞<br />
k<br />
R S1 (X) = x − p(<br />
F ) | dF ( x)<br />
x<br />
where p\F x ) defines a level of the profit (success) that<br />
is used for measuring the abatement.<br />
The positive number k is a measure of the<br />
relative impact of the small and big abatements. q(F x )<br />
is a level a parameter that specifies the abatements<br />
will be included in the risk measurement. The second<br />
measure of the risk within Stone family with three<br />
parameters is defined as k order root from R S1 (X)<br />
(Eq. 7):<br />
⎡<br />
R S2 (X) = ⎢<br />
⎢⎣<br />
q(<br />
Fx<br />
)<br />
∫<br />
−∞<br />
| x − p(<br />
F<br />
x<br />
) |<br />
k<br />
x<br />
1<br />
k<br />
⎤<br />
⋅dFx<br />
( x)<br />
⎥<br />
⎥⎦<br />
(7)<br />
One may observe that through proper<br />
selection of the parameters p(F X ), q{F x ) and k, the<br />
above presented risk measurement are special cases<br />
of those from the Stone family of risk measurements.<br />
For example, if in (l) k = 2 and p(F x ) = (F x )<br />
= µ are inserted, the semi-dispersion is obtained as a<br />
measure of the risk. A more interesting case related to<br />
risk measures Stone family is the generalized risk<br />
measure Eq. (8):<br />
t<br />
R F1 (X) =<br />
∫<br />
−∞<br />
(t - x) α dF x (x) (α > 0), (8)<br />
proposed by Fishburn, where t is a superior scopelevel<br />
that is fixed. This measure results from (l) if one<br />
choose p(F x )=q(F X ) = t. The parameter “a” of<br />
Fishburn risk measurement R F1 may be interpreted as<br />
“k” parameter from the measures Stone family (l) in<br />
this way: it is a risk parameter, which characterizes<br />
the attitude toward risk. The values α > l describe a<br />
sensitive risk, while the values α ∈(0. l) describe an<br />
insensitive risk.<br />
Another known measure of the risk is<br />
Shannon entropy (Eq. 9):<br />
+∞<br />
∫<br />
−∞<br />
fx( x)ln(<br />
f<br />
x<br />
( x))<br />
dx<br />
(9)<br />
5.2. Probabilistic modeling of pollution<br />
Mathematic modeling of air pollution is<br />
done using the theory of stochastic processes. Thus,<br />
over long periods of time, the pollution degree may<br />
be described by a multidimensional stochastic<br />
process: X = (X t ) t ≥ 0 . For t ≥ 0 attached to the<br />
components of the random vector: X t = (X l,t ;<br />
X 2,t ...X m,t ) represents the concentrations of the<br />
atmospheric pollutant factors. Repartition function of<br />
the stochastic multidimensional process X, F(t,x) =<br />
584