01.06.2017 Views

summa-contra-gentiles

Summa

Summa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176 THE SUMMA CONTRA GENTILES<br />

is of all other forms raised highest above matter. Consequently<br />

jt<br />

can produce an operation jwit^hpujtJ,he_body,_ as<br />

being independent of the body in :<br />

operating since not<br />

,e.Yen.in being^es it depend on the body.<br />

In the same way it is clear thiat the reasons whereby<br />

Averroes tries to confirm his opinion,^ do not prove that the<br />

intellectual substance is not united to the body as its form.<br />

For the expressions used by Aristotle in reference to the<br />

possible intellect, when he says that it is impassible, unmixed,<br />

and separate, do not oblige us to admit that the<br />

intellective substance is not united to the body as the form<br />

whence the latter has being. For they are also true if we<br />

say that the intellective power, which Aristotle calls the<br />

poTver of understanding,^ is not the act of an organ, as<br />

though it exercised its operation thereby. This is in fact<br />

shown bv his proof since he proves that : it is unshackled<br />

and separate, from its<br />

operation whereby it understands all<br />

things and because operation belongs to a power as to its<br />

;<br />

principle.<br />

It is consequently clear that neither does Aristotle's proof<br />

show that the intellective substance is not united to the body<br />

as its form. For if we suppose that the soul's substance is<br />

thus united to the body in being, and that the intellect is<br />

not the act of any organ, it will not follow that the intellect<br />

has a particular nature,— I refer to the natures of sensibles :<br />

since it is not admitted to be a harmony,^ nor the reason of<br />

of sense that it<br />

an organ,<br />

— as Aristotle says (2 De Animay<br />

is like the reason of an organ:<br />

— for the intellect has not a<br />

common operation with the body.<br />

That Aristotle, by saying that the intellect is unshackled<br />

or separate, does not mean to exclude its<br />

being a part or<br />

power of the soul which is the form of the whole body, is<br />

clear from what he says at the end of the First Book of De<br />

Anima,^ against those who said that different parts of the<br />

soul are in different parts of the body : // the whole soul<br />

contains the whole body it is meet that each of its parts<br />

»<br />

Ch. lix.<br />

2<br />

cf. ch. Ixi.<br />

* xii. 2.<br />

' V. 25.<br />

»<br />

C/<br />

ch. Ixiv,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!