01.06.2017 Views

summa-contra-gentiles

Summa

Summa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER LXXIX<br />

2^<br />

however, through the weakening of the organ. This is<br />

made clear as follows. If some weakness were essentially<br />

attached to the power, the latter would never be repaired<br />

through the organ being repaired yet we see that, however<br />

much the power of sight may seem to be weakened, : if<br />

the organ be repaired, the sight is repaired : wherefore<br />

Aristotle says (i De AnimaY that if an old man ivere to be<br />

given the eye of a young -man, he would certainly see as well<br />

as a young man does. Accordingly, since the intellect is a<br />

power of the soul that needs no organ, as shown above,' it<br />

is not weakened, either essentially or accidentally, by old<br />

age or any other bodily w^eakness. If, on the other hand,<br />

the operation of the intellect happen to be affected by<br />

fatigue or some hindrance on account of the weakness of<br />

the body, this is owing not to weakness of the intellect<br />

but to the weakness of the powers which the intellect<br />

itself,<br />

needs, namely of the imagination, memory, and cogitative<br />

power. It is therefore clear that the intellect is incorruptible.<br />

Consequently the human soul is also, since it is an intellective<br />

substance.<br />

This is also proved from the authority of Aristotle. For<br />

he says (i<br />

De AnimaY that the intellect is clearly a sub-<br />

from what<br />

stance and incorruptible<br />

: and it may be gathered<br />

has been already said* that this cannot refer to a separate<br />

substance that is either the possible or the active intellect.<br />

It also follows from the very words of Aristotle<br />

(11 Metaph.),^ where he says, speaking against Plato, that<br />

moving causes pre-exist, whereas formal causes are simultaneous<br />

with the things whereof they are causes :<br />

for when a<br />

man is healed, then is there health, and not before; against<br />

Plato's statement that the forms of things exist before the<br />

things themselves. And, after saying this, he goes on to<br />

say As to whether anything remains :<br />

afterwards, this must<br />

be inquired into. For in some this is not impossible<br />

:<br />

for<br />

example, if the soul be of a certain kind, not of any kind,<br />

but if it be intellectual. From which it is clear, since he is<br />

* »v- * 13.<br />

Chs. Ixi., Ixrviii.<br />

* Ch. lx\'iii.<br />

* D. 11, iii. 5.<br />

» Loc. cii.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!