01.06.2017 Views

summa-contra-gentiles

Summa

Summa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER LXXII<br />

i8i<br />

whole denotes relation to parts, it follows that whole is<br />

taken in various senses, according to the various meanings<br />

of parts. Now part is taken in two ways. First, forasmuch<br />

as a thing is divided according to quantity thus two<br />

;<br />

cubits is a part of three cubits. Secondly, forasmuch as a<br />

thing is divided by a division of its essence; thus form and<br />

matter are said to be parts of a composite. Hence a whole<br />

is<br />

spoken of in reference both to quantity and to essential<br />

perfection. Now whole and part in reference to quantity<br />

are not applicable to forms save accidentally, namely in so<br />

far as they are divided when the quantitative subject is<br />

divided. On the other hand whole or part in reference to<br />

essential perfection is found in forms by their very<br />

nature. Speaking then of this kind of totality, which is<br />

applicable to forms by their very nature, it is clear<br />

regarding every form that the whole of it is in the whole<br />

(subject), and the whole of it in each part thereof for :<br />

just as<br />

whiteness is in a whole body in respect of the whole essence<br />

of whiteness, so is it in each part thereof. It is otherwise<br />

with the totality which is ascribed to forms accidentally<br />

:<br />

for in this sense we cannot say that the whole whiteness<br />

is in each part. Accordingly,<br />

if there be a form that is<br />

not divided when its subject is divided, as the souls of<br />

perfect animals, there will be no need for a distinction,<br />

since only one totality is applicable to them : and we must<br />

say absolutely that the whole of it is in each part of the<br />

body. Nor is this difficult to conceive for one who understands<br />

that the soul is not indivisible in the same way as a<br />

point, and that an incorporeal<br />

is not united to a corporeal<br />

being in the same way as bodies are united together, as we<br />

have expounded above. ^<br />

Nor is it inconsistent that the soul, since it is a simple<br />

form, should be the act of parts so various. Because the<br />

matter of every form is<br />

adapted to it according to its<br />

requirements. Now the more noble and simple a form is,<br />

the greater is its<br />

power and : consequently the soul which<br />

is the noblest of the lower forms, though simple in substance,<br />

» Ch. Ivi.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!