01.06.2017 Views

summa-contra-gentiles

Summa

Summa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

250 THE SUMMA CONTRA GENTILES<br />

the eternity of a truth understood may be taken in two<br />

ways in one way, as to the thing understood in another<br />

: ;<br />

as to that whereby<br />

it is understood. If the understood<br />

truth be eternal as regards the thing understood, it follows<br />

that the thing understood is eternal, but not the one who<br />

understands : whereas if the understood truth be eternal as<br />

to that whereby it is understood, it would follow that the<br />

soul which understands it is eternal. Now the understood<br />

truth is eternal not in the latter but in the former way : for<br />

it is clear from what has been said that the intelligible<br />

species, by which our soul understands truth, are acquired<br />

by us from the phantasms through the active intellect.^<br />

Henoe it cannot be inferred that the soul is eternal, but that<br />

the truths understood are based on something eternal, for<br />

their foundation is in the first truth, as in the universal<br />

cause which contains all truth. But the soul is<br />

compared<br />

to this eternal thing, not as subject to form, but as a thing<br />

to its<br />

proper end, because the true is the good of the intellect<br />

and the end thereof.^ Now from a thing's end we can<br />

argue about its duration, just as we can argue about its<br />

beginning from its efficient cause : since what is directed to<br />

an eternal end must be capable of enduring for ever. Consequently,<br />

from the eternity of intelligible truth we can<br />

prove that the soul is immortal, but not that it is eternal.<br />

That neither can the latter be proved from the eternity of<br />

the agent<br />

is clear from what has been said above^ when we<br />

were discussing the eternity of creatures.<br />

The third objection which refers to the perfection of the<br />

universe is not cogent. For the perfection of the universe<br />

regards the species, not the individuals : since the universe<br />

is continually receiving an addition of individuals to the<br />

pre-existing species. Now human souls do not differ<br />

specifically among themselves, but only numerically, as we<br />

have proved.* Consequently<br />

it is not inconsistent with the<br />

perfection of the universe, if new souls be created.<br />

Hence we may gather the reply to the fourth objection.<br />

» C/. ch. Ixivi.<br />

• Cf. 6 Ethic, ii. 3.<br />

'<br />

Ch. xxxi. ^eqq. * Ch. Ixxxi.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!