01.06.2017 Views

summa-contra-gentiles

Summa

Summa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8o<br />

THE SUMMA CONTRA GENTILES<br />

which they had under consideration. For since all our<br />

knowledge begins from the senses which are about singulars,<br />

human speculations proceeded from particular to universal<br />

considerations. Wherefore those who sought the principle<br />

of things considered only the particular makings of beings,<br />

and inquired in what manner this particular fire or this<br />

particular stone was made. At first, considering the<br />

making of things more from an outward point of view than<br />

it behoved them to do, they stated that a thing<br />

is made only<br />

in respect of certain accidental dispositions, such as rarity,<br />

density, and so forth ;<br />

and they said, in consequence, that<br />

to be made was nothing else than to be altered, for the<br />

reason that they understood everything to be made from an<br />

actual being. Later on, they considered the making of<br />

things more inwardly, and made a step<br />

forward to the<br />

making of things in regard to their substance for they<br />

:<br />

asserted that a thing does not need to be made, except<br />

accidentally, from an actual being, and that it is made<br />

per se from a being in potentiality. But this making,<br />

which is of a being from any being whatsoever, is the<br />

which is made for as much as<br />

making of a particular being,<br />

it is this being, for instance a man or a fire, but not for as<br />

much as it is considered universally<br />

: for there was previously<br />

a being which is transformed into this being.<br />

Entering still more deeply into the origin of things, they<br />

considered at last the procession of all created being from<br />

one first cause ;<br />

as appears from the arguments given above^<br />

which prove this. In this procession of all being from God<br />

it is not possible for anything to be made from something<br />

already existing ; since it would not be the making of all<br />

created being.<br />

The early natural philosophers had no conception of such<br />

a making, for it was their common opinion that frovi nothing<br />

naught<br />

is made. Or if any of them conceived the idea, they<br />

did not consider that the name of making was applicable<br />

thereto, since the word making implies movement or change,<br />

whereas in this origin of all being from one first being, the<br />

1<br />

Ch. xvi.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!