01.06.2017 Views

summa-contra-gentiles

Summa

Summa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER XCVIII 299<br />

they would pass from potentiality to act, and thus they<br />

would be moved per se or accidentally. There is, therefore,<br />

in them potentiality and act as regards intelligible being,<br />

just as there is in the heavenly bodies as regards natural<br />

being. For the matter of a heavenly body<br />

is so perfected<br />

by its form, that it does not remain in potentiality to other<br />

forms : and in like manner the intellect of a separate substance<br />

is<br />

wholly perfected by intelligible forms, with respect<br />

to its natural knowledge. On the other hand our possible<br />

intellect is<br />

proportionate to the corruptible bodies to which<br />

it is united as a form : because it is made to have certain<br />

intelligible forms actually in such a way that it remains in<br />

to others. For this reason it is stated in De<br />

potentiality<br />

Causis^ that an intelligence is full of forms, since, to<br />

wit, the whole potentiality of its intellect is<br />

And perfected by<br />

thus one separate substance is able<br />

intelligible forms.<br />

to understand another through these intelligible forms.<br />

Someone, however, may think that, since a separate<br />

substance is intelligible by its nature, there is no need to<br />

assert that one is understood by another through intelligible<br />

species, but that they understand one another by the very<br />

essence of the substance understood. For it would seem<br />

that the fact of a substance being understood through an<br />

intelligible species is accidental to material substances,<br />

from their not being actually intelligible through their<br />

essence : wherefore it is necessary for them to be understood<br />

through abstract intentions. Moreover this seems in<br />

accord with the statement of the Philosopher who says<br />

(11 Metaph.y that in separate substances there is no distinction<br />

between matter, intellect, the act of understanding,<br />

and the thing understood.<br />

And yet<br />

if this be granted<br />

it involves not a few difficulties.<br />

First, because the intellect in act is the thing understood in<br />

act according to the teaching of Aristotle :' and it is difficult<br />

to see how one separate substance is identified with another<br />

when it understands it.<br />

Again. Every agent or operator acts through its form,<br />

^ Loc.cit. * ix. 5.<br />

*<br />

-^De Aninta'vf. 2, \. 12.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!