01.06.2017 Views

summa-contra-gentiles

Summa

Summa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER XVII 25<br />

But matter is a being in potentiality.<br />

is<br />

pure act must needs be simply prior to matter, and<br />

Therefore God Who<br />

consequently the cause thereof. Therefore matter is not<br />

necessarily presupposed for His action.<br />

Again. Primary matter is in some way, for it is a being<br />

in potentiality. Now God is the cause of all things that<br />

are, as we have proved.^ Therefore God is the cause of<br />

primary matter : to which nothing is pre-existent. Therefore<br />

the divine action needs no pre-existing nature.<br />

Divine Scripture confirms this truth, saying (Gen. i. i) :<br />

In the beginning God created heaven and earth. For to<br />

create is<br />

nothing else than to bring something into being<br />

without prejacent matter.<br />

Hereby is refuted the error of the ancient philosophers<br />

who asserted that matter has no cause whatever, because<br />

they observed that in the actions of particular agents<br />

something is always prejacent to action whence : they<br />

drew the opinion common to all that from nothing naught<br />

is made.^ This is true in particular agents. But they had<br />

not yet arrived at the knowledge of the universal agent,<br />

which is the active cause of all being, and of necessity<br />

presupposes nothing for His action.<br />

CHAPTER XVII<br />

THAT CRE-ATION IS NEITHER MOVEMENT NOR CHANGE<br />

Having proved the foregoing,<br />

it is evident that God's<br />

action, which is without prejacent matter and is called<br />

creation, is neither movement nor change, properly<br />

speaking.<br />

For all movement or change is the action of that which<br />

is in potentiality as such.^ Now in this action there preexists<br />

nothing in potentiality to receive the action, as we<br />

have proved.* Therefore it is neither movement nor change.<br />

Again. The extremes of a movement or change are<br />

included in the same order : either because they come under<br />

^ Ch. XV. « Cf. I Phys. iv. 2.<br />

' 3 Phys.<br />

i. 6. « Ch. xvl

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!