Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)

Management – Marketing - Tourism
practice but it denial is not possible.
Starting from the paradox of Arrow’s theory, an analysis based on Rorty's
ironist theory could provide a possible approach for the implementation of ethics in the
politics public area, not over a contingency ethics beyond the great classical theories.
The focus on contingency “implies the fact that all that matters in order to be a decent
human being is relatively close to the historical circumstances, it is a matter of
ephemeral unity related to the question of which attitudes are normal and which
practices are just or unjust” (Rorty, 1998). When traditional models fall down in a field
or when the ethical vein is questioned, “we would like to find something that should
stay beyond history and institutions” (Rorty, 1998). A so-called solution could be also
found at the level of the ethics of a concern, by a certain type of sensitivity towards the
others ion the public area where we live. “We have the moral obligation to feel a
sensation of solidarity with all the other human beings” (Mureşan, 2008).
REFERENCES
1. Aristotel Politica, Bucureşti: Editura Iri, 2001.
2. Baba, C., Politici publice. Opţiuni ale dezvoltării unei democraţii durabile,
Gorun, A. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2002.
3. Beauchamp, F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, New York,: Oxford
Childress, T.L., University Press, 2001.
4. Bondar, F. Politici publice şi administraţie publică, Iaşi: Polirom, 2006.
5. Carpinschi, A. Deschidere şi sens în gândirea politică, Iaşi: Editura Institutul
European, 1995.
6. Jonsen, A. R., The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral REasoning, Berkeley:
Toulmin, S. University of California Press, 1988.
7. Kathrn, D Foundation of Administrative Etics: A moral Approach Public,
Productivity and Managemnt Review, New York, 1989.
8. Lindblom, C. The Science of Muddling Through, Public Administration Review,
1959.
9. Mill, J.S. Despre libertate, Bucureşti: Editura Humanitas, 1994.
10. Miroiu, A. Introducere în analiza politicilor publice, Bucureşti: Editura Punct,
2001.
11. Mungiu-
Pippidi, A.,
Ioniţă, S.
Politici publice. Teorie şi practică, Iaşi: Polirom, 2002.
12. Mureşan, V. Axiologie şi moralitate, Bucureşti: Editura Punct, 2001.
13. Mureşan, V. Etică fără principii, Revista verso, Bucureşti, 2008.
14. Platon Republica, Opere, vol. V, Bucureşti: Editura Ştiinţifică, 1966.
15. Profiroiu, M. Politici Publice. Teorie, analiză, practică, Bucureşti: Editura
Economică, 2006.
16. Rorty, R. Contingenţă, ironie şi solidaritate, Bucureşti: Editura All, 1998.
17. Rorty, R. Is Philosophy Relevant to Applied Ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly,
2006.
18. * * * http://adrianmiroiu.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/02introd-eticaaplicata.pdf
19. * * * http://www.spidd.ro/carti/analiza%20politicilorpublice.pdf
20. * * * http://www.studiieuropene.ro/id_anul2/anul1/1-2-
2_iliescu_eticapolitica.pdf
115