13.12.2012 Views

Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)

Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)

Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Economic <strong>The</strong>ories – International Economic Relations<br />

increases. Thus, the highest value of net export, of -153.4 billion lei, was recorded in 2008<br />

(year when the “economic boom” took place in Romania), and the lowest in 1994 (of -14.8<br />

billion lei).<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that we import more that we export, and foreign payments and higher<br />

than foreign currency revenue, in other words, we consume more than we produce, led to<br />

a chronic deficit of the commercial balance. <strong>The</strong> existence of this negative net export is<br />

explained by the existence of a higher domestic demand (consumption + investments)<br />

than the domestic supply (GDP), in other words, in the existence of a state of<br />

disequilibrium called domestic absorption (figure no. 5). Insufficient adaptation of the<br />

national supply to the market’s needs caused the covering of the gap by resorting to<br />

imports, but with negative consequences on the both external and domestic equilibrium.<br />

<strong>The</strong> statistical analysis carried out based on the data in annexe no. 1, regarding<br />

the net export and employed population, show that, in Romania, between 1990 and<br />

2009, between the two variables there was a direct relationship, but of a very low<br />

intensity, getting a value of +0.318 for the Pearson correlation coefficient. In other<br />

words, the growth of negative net export, which equals higher imports than exports,<br />

constituted one of the causes that led to the decrease of employed population in<br />

Romania. <strong>The</strong> explanation consists in the existence of a high level of import of goods<br />

and services as compared to export, fact that does not create favourable conditions for<br />

increasing domestic output, on the contrary. In its turn, the reduction of output<br />

(especially the industrial one), in Romania caused lay-offs and consequently the<br />

reduction of the employment.<br />

<strong>The</strong>refore, taking some measures of economic policy for stimulating domestic<br />

production of economic goods is required. <strong>The</strong>se goods must be comparable with those<br />

imported as far as the quality-price relationship is concerned. Only in this case the<br />

Romanian consumer will satisfy consumption based on domestically produced products<br />

to the detriment of those produced abroad.<br />

In order to reduce the negative effect of import on labour employment, it is<br />

necessary for domestic producers to adapt their supply to the requirements of<br />

companies in order for the domestic demand of consumer and investment goods to find<br />

correspondence in the domestic supply.<br />

3.4 <strong>The</strong> simultaneous influence of the components of aggregate demand on<br />

employment<br />

Taking into consideration the data recorded in Romania between 1990 and<br />

2009, we aim to highlight the simultaneous influence of the aggregate demand<br />

components as well as the overall influence of the aggregate demand on employment,<br />

being known that the individual elements of the aggregate demand interact among each<br />

other and all these interact with aggregate supply.<br />

Based on the analysis of the data in the table of multiple correlation (table no.1),<br />

it is noticed that real aggregate demand (made up of domestic demand and external<br />

demand) is significantly influenced by consumption, there being a Pearson correlation<br />

coefficient of 0.971, value that reflects a very strong direct relationship. We can state<br />

that in Romania, between 1990 and 2009, the aggregate demand growth was mostly<br />

caused by the growth in the final consumption demand (private and public). Between<br />

real investments and aggregate demand, there is also a strong direct relationship, the<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient having the value of 0.867. On the contrary, it is noticed<br />

that there is a very strong negative relationship between the economic variable that<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!