Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)
Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)
Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Economic <strong>The</strong>ories – International Economic Relations<br />
increases. Thus, the highest value of net export, of -153.4 billion lei, was recorded in 2008<br />
(year when the “economic boom” took place in Romania), and the lowest in 1994 (of -14.8<br />
billion lei).<br />
<strong>The</strong> fact that we import more that we export, and foreign payments and higher<br />
than foreign currency revenue, in other words, we consume more than we produce, led to<br />
a chronic deficit of the commercial balance. <strong>The</strong> existence of this negative net export is<br />
explained by the existence of a higher domestic demand (consumption + investments)<br />
than the domestic supply (GDP), in other words, in the existence of a state of<br />
disequilibrium called domestic absorption (figure no. 5). Insufficient adaptation of the<br />
national supply to the market’s needs caused the covering of the gap by resorting to<br />
imports, but with negative consequences on the both external and domestic equilibrium.<br />
<strong>The</strong> statistical analysis carried out based on the data in annexe no. 1, regarding<br />
the net export and employed population, show that, in Romania, between 1990 and<br />
2009, between the two variables there was a direct relationship, but of a very low<br />
intensity, getting a value of +0.318 for the Pearson correlation coefficient. In other<br />
words, the growth of negative net export, which equals higher imports than exports,<br />
constituted one of the causes that led to the decrease of employed population in<br />
Romania. <strong>The</strong> explanation consists in the existence of a high level of import of goods<br />
and services as compared to export, fact that does not create favourable conditions for<br />
increasing domestic output, on the contrary. In its turn, the reduction of output<br />
(especially the industrial one), in Romania caused lay-offs and consequently the<br />
reduction of the employment.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, taking some measures of economic policy for stimulating domestic<br />
production of economic goods is required. <strong>The</strong>se goods must be comparable with those<br />
imported as far as the quality-price relationship is concerned. Only in this case the<br />
Romanian consumer will satisfy consumption based on domestically produced products<br />
to the detriment of those produced abroad.<br />
In order to reduce the negative effect of import on labour employment, it is<br />
necessary for domestic producers to adapt their supply to the requirements of<br />
companies in order for the domestic demand of consumer and investment goods to find<br />
correspondence in the domestic supply.<br />
3.4 <strong>The</strong> simultaneous influence of the components of aggregate demand on<br />
employment<br />
Taking into consideration the data recorded in Romania between 1990 and<br />
2009, we aim to highlight the simultaneous influence of the aggregate demand<br />
components as well as the overall influence of the aggregate demand on employment,<br />
being known that the individual elements of the aggregate demand interact among each<br />
other and all these interact with aggregate supply.<br />
Based on the analysis of the data in the table of multiple correlation (table no.1),<br />
it is noticed that real aggregate demand (made up of domestic demand and external<br />
demand) is significantly influenced by consumption, there being a Pearson correlation<br />
coefficient of 0.971, value that reflects a very strong direct relationship. We can state<br />
that in Romania, between 1990 and 2009, the aggregate demand growth was mostly<br />
caused by the growth in the final consumption demand (private and public). Between<br />
real investments and aggregate demand, there is also a strong direct relationship, the<br />
Pearson correlation coefficient having the value of 0.867. On the contrary, it is noticed<br />
that there is a very strong negative relationship between the economic variable that<br />
139