13.12.2012 Views

Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)

Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)

Revista Tinerilor Economiºti (The Young Economists Journal)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Revista</strong> <strong>Tinerilor</strong> Economişti (<strong>The</strong> <strong>Young</strong> <strong>Economists</strong> <strong>Journal</strong>)<br />

important communication mechanism. <strong>The</strong>y are the category of staff, by their nature,<br />

will always try new things.<br />

Chances are they to instigate change.<br />

- new arrivals (13.5%) - they will try new ideas carefully. <strong>The</strong>y also must be<br />

included in the communication plan, because their influence is essential and how their<br />

resistance will advance the process of change. <strong>The</strong>y are usually opinion leaders.<br />

- early majority (34%) - they are attentive, but accept change more quickly than the<br />

majority of staff. Most of the time is a bit more conservative than the newcomers.<br />

- late majority (34%) - they will change only when the majority are in favor of, or<br />

actually use the new system. This personnel change will not go along with the belief in<br />

the project, but rather from a sense that change is inevitable. We can get them into<br />

compliance over time, but not their enthusiasm.<br />

- laggards (16%) - they like to stick to old ways. It can sometimes be useful to<br />

recognize (at the beginning of a communications campaign) that there will be people<br />

who will not like the new system, but that they will be supported and assisted by a<br />

thorough preparation. However, they can not stand in the way of progress and change<br />

leader must point out that quite clear.<br />

In conclusion, in the process of change is important to achieve effective<br />

communication with the 84% of staff who we know will fit and let laggards to adhere to<br />

change at their own pace.<br />

Shows the importance of this hypothesis based on Rogers's model, because it is<br />

pointless trying to convince all employees to take initiative for change with a quick<br />

move of mass communication.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Given that changes are made to people and not for the sake of change, it must be<br />

said that the human factor is decisive in the process of change, he has a complex<br />

structure, concrete steps and laws. Only clear view on this process, knowledge of<br />

factors (external and internal) of great importance for the successful implementation of<br />

change, it will allow efficient routing.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Burdus,E., coord.;<br />

Caprarescu, Gh.,<br />

Androniceanu, A.<br />

Managementul schimbării organizationale, Editura<br />

Economica, Bucuresti , 2008<br />

2. Cameron, E.; Green , M. Making Sense of Change Management, Kogan Page, 2004<br />

3. Kotter, J.P; Cohen D.S Inima schimbarii, Editura Meteor Press, Bucuresti, 2008<br />

4. Newton , R. Managementul schimbării pas cu pas, Editura All, Bucuresti,<br />

2009<br />

5. * * * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffusion_of_innovations<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!