29.08.2017 Views

Practical_Photoshop__Issue_77__August_2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WHITE BALANCE:<br />

HOW DO RAWS<br />

AND JPEGS HOLD<br />

UP TO COLOR<br />

FIXES?<br />

Shoot raw and, because the<br />

raw color data is recorded,<br />

you can change the white<br />

balance after the fact. Here<br />

our initial image was shot<br />

in Raw+JPEG and set to<br />

Tungsten white balance,<br />

which has resulted in an<br />

unnatural blue cast. Then<br />

both versions were fixed<br />

by clicking on a neutral grey<br />

point (in this case, the white<br />

vest) using the White Balance<br />

tool in Camera Raw. (This can<br />

also be done in Lightroom,<br />

or with <strong>Photoshop</strong>’s Curves/<br />

Levels midpoint eyedropper.)<br />

The fixed raw gives more<br />

of a natural balance between<br />

the warm skin tones and<br />

the blues and<br />

greens in the<br />

background,<br />

while the JPEG<br />

fix has left<br />

the balance<br />

slightly awry,<br />

with neither skin<br />

nor background<br />

entirely accurate.<br />

BEFORE<br />

JPEG FIXED<br />

RAW FIXED<br />

WHEN TO USE<br />

RAW AND JPEG<br />

Many SLRs and CSCs have<br />

a Raw+JPEG setting that lets you<br />

record both file formats at once.<br />

If you’re happy to accept the extra<br />

memory card space the second<br />

file will occupy, it gives you the<br />

best of both worlds. The raw file<br />

will hold all the original color info,<br />

so you can archive it with the<br />

knowledge that you can always go back to it. But if you’re satisfied with the look of<br />

the JPEG, there’s no need to bother processing the raw. It’s also useful when you need<br />

a quick turnaround on a set of images, as you can quickly access the JPEGs.<br />

JPEG FILE<br />

COMPRESSION:<br />

HOW BAD IS IT<br />

REALLY?<br />

JPEGs are a lossy format,<br />

meaning there’s an<br />

incremental loss of data<br />

every time you open and<br />

save a file. If you only open<br />

each file once or twice, this<br />

is probably acceptable – but<br />

any more and you’ll notice<br />

a drop in quality, especially<br />

in areas of soft gradation<br />

like blue skies. How much<br />

should you worry about it?<br />

Saved once<br />

Our original raw image was<br />

processed in Camera Raw,<br />

then saved as a JPEG. There’s<br />

no noticeable loss in quality,<br />

and so there’s no need to<br />

worry about compression.<br />

Saved 10 times<br />

Now we’ve opened and resaved<br />

the image 10 times<br />

in <strong>Photoshop</strong>, using the<br />

highest Quality setting. The<br />

repeated compression has<br />

caused banding in the sky.<br />

Saved 50 times<br />

Granted, not many images<br />

will be re-saved 50 times<br />

over, but it highlights the<br />

huge drop in quality. Despite<br />

the drop, the actual file size<br />

has increased from an initial<br />

17MB to 18.3MB.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!