11.11.2019 Views

Marketing_Management_14th_Edition-min

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CREATING BRAND EQUITY | CHAPTER 9 247<br />

By plotting a representative group of brands’ scores for both strength and stature, this matrix derived from the BrandAsset Valuator shows an<br />

accurate picture of a brand’s status and overall performance.<br />

STRENGTH<br />

Energized Differentiation and Relevance<br />

HIGH<br />

LOW<br />

Zara<br />

These brands have low brand strength but high<br />

potential. They have built some energy and<br />

relevance, but are known to only a relatively<br />

small audience. Consumers are expressing<br />

curiosity and interest.<br />

Tazo<br />

Lenovo<br />

Method<br />

Grameen Bank<br />

Shiseido<br />

Kayak.com<br />

Flickr<br />

BitTorrent<br />

Second Life<br />

Joost<br />

Camper<br />

Pom<br />

Glacéau<br />

Vita<strong>min</strong><br />

Water<br />

AMD<br />

Palm<br />

Patagonia<br />

Crocs<br />

Lindt<br />

Facebook<br />

Moet & Chandon<br />

Red Bull<br />

NEW/UNFOCUSED<br />

Kia<br />

Michelob<br />

Napster Viacom<br />

Vespa<br />

Finesse<br />

Vonage Taster´s Choice<br />

Dristan<br />

Wikipedia<br />

Mini Cooper<br />

TiVo<br />

SanDisk<br />

NICHE/MOMENTUM<br />

Garnier<br />

Lacoste<br />

Silk Soymilk<br />

Autotrader<br />

Schlitz Diners Club Efferdent<br />

These brands, with both low brand stature<br />

and low brand strength, are not well known<br />

among the general population. Many are new<br />

entrants; others are middling brands that have<br />

lost their way.<br />

Absolut<br />

NBA<br />

IKEA<br />

Kodak<br />

Xbox<br />

NASCAR<br />

Nordstrom<br />

AOL<br />

STATURE<br />

Esteem and Knowledge<br />

Pixar<br />

Dr. Pepper<br />

LG<br />

Ninetendo Wii Apple<br />

iPhone<br />

BlackBerry<br />

These brands have become irresistible,<br />

combining high brand strength with high brand<br />

stature. They have high earnings, high margin<br />

power, and the greatest potential to create<br />

future value.<br />

Denny´s<br />

Sprint<br />

Midas<br />

Century 21<br />

Prudential<br />

Alpo<br />

Netflix<br />

DirecTV<br />

ERODING/DECLINING<br />

Harley-Davidson<br />

Amazon<br />

Adidas<br />

Nikon<br />

LEADERSHIP<br />

Blockbuster<br />

Bausch & Lomb<br />

Bank of America<br />

American Airlines<br />

Greyhound<br />

Burger King<br />

H&R Block<br />

Toyota<br />

Xerox<br />

Tylenol<br />

Verizon<br />

Advil<br />

Staples<br />

Nike Microsoft<br />

GE Target<br />

Gerber<br />

These brands show why high brand stature by<br />

itself is insufficient for maintaining a leading<br />

position. They struggle to overcome what<br />

consumers already know about and expect<br />

from them.<br />

HIGH<br />

|Fig. 9.2|<br />

The Universe<br />

of Brand<br />

Performance<br />

Source: Young & Rubicam<br />

BrandAsset Valuator.<br />

Nothing else beats it<br />

Does it offer something<br />

better than the others?<br />

Can it deliver?<br />

Bonding<br />

Advantage<br />

Performance<br />

Strong relationship/<br />

High share of category expenditure<br />

|Fig. 9.3|<br />

BrandDynamics<br />

Pyramid<br />

Source: BrandDynamics Pyramid. Reprinted with<br />

permission of Millward Brown.<br />

Does it offer<br />

me something?<br />

Relevance<br />

Do I know<br />

about it?<br />

Presence<br />

Weak relationship/<br />

Low share of category expenditure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!