ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />
B.12 Definition of Held-to-Maturity Financial Assets: Index-Linked Principal<br />
Entity A purchases a five-year equity-index-linked note with an original issue price<br />
of CU10 at a market price of CU12 at the time of purchase. The note requires no<br />
interest payments before maturity. At maturity, the note requires payment of the<br />
original issue price of CU10 plus a supplemental redemption amount that depends<br />
on whether a specified share price index exceeds a predetermined level at the<br />
maturity date. If the share index does not exceed or is equal to the predetermined<br />
level, no supplemental redemption amount is paid. If the share index exceeds the<br />
predetermined level, the supplemental redemption amount equals the product of<br />
1.15 <strong>and</strong> the difference between the level of the share index at maturity <strong>and</strong> the level<br />
of the share index when the note was issued divided by the level of the share index at<br />
the time of issue. Entity A has the positive intention <strong>and</strong> ability to hold the note to<br />
maturity. Can Entity A classify the note as a held-to-maturity investment?<br />
Yes. The note can be classified as a held-to-maturity investment because it has a<br />
fixed payment of CU10 <strong>and</strong> fixed maturity <strong>and</strong> Entity A has the positive intention<br />
<strong>and</strong> ability to hold it to maturity (IPSAS 29.10). However, the equity index feature is<br />
a call option not closely related to the debt host, which must be separated as an<br />
embedded derivative under IPSAS 29.12. The purchase price of CU12 is allocated<br />
between the host debt instrument <strong>and</strong> the embedded derivative. For example, if the<br />
fair value of the embedded option at acquisition is CU4, the host debt instrument is<br />
measured at CU8 on initial <strong>recognition</strong>. In this case, the discount of CU2 that is<br />
implicit in the host bond (principal of CU10 minus the original carrying amount of<br />
CU8) is amortized to surplus or deficit over the term to maturity of the note using the<br />
effective interest method.<br />
B.13 Definition of Held-to-Maturity Financial Assets: Index-Linked Interest<br />
Can a bond with a fixed payment at maturity <strong>and</strong> a fixed maturity date be classified<br />
as a held-to-maturity investment if the bond’s interest payments are indexed to the<br />
price of a commodity, <strong>and</strong> the entity has the positive intention <strong>and</strong> ability to hold<br />
the bond to maturity?<br />
Yes. However, the commodity-indexed interest payments result in an embedded<br />
derivative that is separated <strong>and</strong> accounted for as a derivative at fair value (IPSAS<br />
29.12). IPSAS 29.14 is not applicable since it should be straightforward to separate<br />
the host debt investment (the fixed payment at maturity) from the embedded<br />
derivative (the index-linked interest payments).<br />
B.14 Definition of Held-to-Maturity Financial Assets: Sale Following Rating<br />
Downgrade<br />
Would a sale of a held-to-maturity investment following a downgrade of the issuer’s<br />
credit rating by a rating agency raise a question about the entity’s intention to hold<br />
other investments to maturity?<br />
1165<br />
IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE<br />
PUBLIC SECTOR