22.12.2012 Views

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />

B.12 Definition of Held-to-Maturity Financial Assets: Index-Linked Principal<br />

Entity A purchases a five-year equity-index-linked note with an original issue price<br />

of CU10 at a market price of CU12 at the time of purchase. The note requires no<br />

interest payments before maturity. At maturity, the note requires payment of the<br />

original issue price of CU10 plus a supplemental redemption amount that depends<br />

on whether a specified share price index exceeds a predetermined level at the<br />

maturity date. If the share index does not exceed or is equal to the predetermined<br />

level, no supplemental redemption amount is paid. If the share index exceeds the<br />

predetermined level, the supplemental redemption amount equals the product of<br />

1.15 <strong>and</strong> the difference between the level of the share index at maturity <strong>and</strong> the level<br />

of the share index when the note was issued divided by the level of the share index at<br />

the time of issue. Entity A has the positive intention <strong>and</strong> ability to hold the note to<br />

maturity. Can Entity A classify the note as a held-to-maturity investment?<br />

Yes. The note can be classified as a held-to-maturity investment because it has a<br />

fixed payment of CU10 <strong>and</strong> fixed maturity <strong>and</strong> Entity A has the positive intention<br />

<strong>and</strong> ability to hold it to maturity (IPSAS 29.10). However, the equity index feature is<br />

a call option not closely related to the debt host, which must be separated as an<br />

embedded derivative under IPSAS 29.12. The purchase price of CU12 is allocated<br />

between the host debt instrument <strong>and</strong> the embedded derivative. For example, if the<br />

fair value of the embedded option at acquisition is CU4, the host debt instrument is<br />

measured at CU8 on initial <strong>recognition</strong>. In this case, the discount of CU2 that is<br />

implicit in the host bond (principal of CU10 minus the original carrying amount of<br />

CU8) is amortized to surplus or deficit over the term to maturity of the note using the<br />

effective interest method.<br />

B.13 Definition of Held-to-Maturity Financial Assets: Index-Linked Interest<br />

Can a bond with a fixed payment at maturity <strong>and</strong> a fixed maturity date be classified<br />

as a held-to-maturity investment if the bond’s interest payments are indexed to the<br />

price of a commodity, <strong>and</strong> the entity has the positive intention <strong>and</strong> ability to hold<br />

the bond to maturity?<br />

Yes. However, the commodity-indexed interest payments result in an embedded<br />

derivative that is separated <strong>and</strong> accounted for as a derivative at fair value (IPSAS<br />

29.12). IPSAS 29.14 is not applicable since it should be straightforward to separate<br />

the host debt investment (the fixed payment at maturity) from the embedded<br />

derivative (the index-linked interest payments).<br />

B.14 Definition of Held-to-Maturity Financial Assets: Sale Following Rating<br />

Downgrade<br />

Would a sale of a held-to-maturity investment following a downgrade of the issuer’s<br />

credit rating by a rating agency raise a question about the entity’s intention to hold<br />

other investments to maturity?<br />

1165<br />

IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE<br />

PUBLIC SECTOR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!