22.12.2012 Views

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />

This type of designation also permits flexibility in deciding how to reinvest cash flows<br />

when they occur. Since the hedged risk relates only to a single period that corresponds<br />

with the repricing period of the interest rate swap designated as the hedging instrument, it<br />

is not necessary to determine at the designation date whether the cash flows will be<br />

reinvested in fixed rate or variable rate assets or to specify at the date of designation the<br />

life of the asset to be acquired.<br />

Effectiveness Considerations<br />

Ineffectiveness is greatly reduced by designating a specific portion of the cash flow<br />

exposure as being hedged.<br />

• Ineffectiveness due to credit differences between the interest rate swap <strong>and</strong> hedged<br />

forecast cash flow is eliminated by designating the cash flow risk being hedged as<br />

the risk attributable to changes in the interest rates that correspond with the rates<br />

inherent in the swap, such as the AA rate curve. This type of designation prevents<br />

changes resulting from changes in credit spreads from being considered as<br />

ineffectiveness.<br />

• Ineffectiveness due to duration differences between the interest rate swap <strong>and</strong><br />

hedged forecast cash flow is eliminated by designating the interest rate risk being<br />

hedged as the risk relating to changes in the portion of the yield curve that<br />

corresponds with the period in which the variable rate leg of the interest rate swap<br />

is repriced.<br />

• Ineffectiveness due to interest rate changes that occur between the repricing date<br />

of the interest rate swap <strong>and</strong> the date of the forecast transactions is eliminated by<br />

simply not hedging that period of time. The period from the repricing of the swap<br />

<strong>and</strong> the occurrence of the forecast transactions in the period immediately<br />

following the repricing of the swap is left unhedged. Therefore, the difference in<br />

dates does not result in ineffectiveness.<br />

Accounting Considerations<br />

The ability to qualify for hedge accounting using the methodology described here is<br />

founded on provisions in IPSAS 29 <strong>and</strong> on interpretations of its requirements. Some of<br />

those are described in the answer to Question F.6.2 Hedge Accounting Considerations<br />

when Interest Rate Risk is Managed on a Net Basis. Some additional <strong>and</strong> supporting<br />

provisions <strong>and</strong> interpretations are identified below.<br />

Hedging a Portion of the Risk Exposure<br />

The ability to identify <strong>and</strong> hedge only a portion of the cash flow risk exposure resulting<br />

from the reinvestment of cash flows or repricing of variable rate <strong>instruments</strong> is found in<br />

IPSAS 29.90 as interpreted in the answers to Questions F.6.2 Issue (k) <strong>and</strong> F.2.17 Partial<br />

Term Hedging.<br />

1265<br />

IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE<br />

PUBLIC SECTOR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!