ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />
B.20 Definition of Held-to-Maturity Investments: Application of the “Tainting”<br />
Rule on Consolidation<br />
Can an entity apply the conditions in IPSAS 29.10 separately to held-to-maturity<br />
financial assets held by different entities in an economic entity, for example, if<br />
separate entities are in different countries with different legal or economic<br />
environments?<br />
No. If an entity has sold or reclassified more than an insignificant amount of investments<br />
classified as held-to-maturity in the consolidated financial statements, it cannot classify<br />
any financial assets as held-to-maturity financial assets in the consolidated financial<br />
statements unless the conditions in IPSAS 29.10 are met.<br />
B.21 Definition of Loans <strong>and</strong> Receivables: Equity Instrument<br />
Can an equity instrument, such as a preference share, with fixed or determinable<br />
payments be classified within loans <strong>and</strong> receivables by the holder?<br />
Yes. If a non-derivative equity instrument would be recorded as a liability by the issuer,<br />
<strong>and</strong> it has fixed or determinable payments <strong>and</strong> is not quoted in an active market, it can be<br />
classified within loans <strong>and</strong> receivables by the holder, provided the definition is otherwise<br />
met. IPSAS 27.13–IPSAS 27.27 provide guidance about the classification of a financial<br />
instrument as a liability or as an equity instrument from the perspective of the issuer of a<br />
financial instrument. If an instrument meets the definition of an equity instrument under<br />
IPSAS 28, it cannot be classified within loans <strong>and</strong> receivables by the holder.<br />
B.22 Definition of Loans <strong>and</strong> Receivables: Banks’ Deposits in Other Banks<br />
Banks make term deposits with a central bank or other banks. Sometimes, the<br />
proof of deposit is negotiable, sometimes not. Even if negotiable, the depositor bank<br />
may or may not intend to sell it. Would such a deposit fall within loans <strong>and</strong><br />
receivables under IPSAS 29.10?<br />
Such a deposit meets the definition of loans <strong>and</strong> receivables, whether or not the proof of<br />
deposit is negotiable, unless the depositor bank intends to sell the instrument immediately<br />
or in the near term, in which case the deposit is classified as a financial asset held for<br />
trading.<br />
B.23 Definition of Amortized Cost: Perpetual Debt Instruments with Fixed or<br />
Market-Based Variable Rate<br />
Sometimes entities purchase or issue debt <strong>instruments</strong> that are required to be<br />
measured at amortized cost <strong>and</strong> in respect of which the issuer has no obligation to<br />
repay the principal amount. Interest may be paid either at a fixed rate or at a<br />
variable rate. Would the difference between the initial amount paid or received <strong>and</strong><br />
zero (“the maturity amount”) be amortized immediately on initial <strong>recognition</strong> for<br />
the purpose of determining amortized cost if the rate of interest is fixed or specified<br />
as a market-based variable rate?<br />
IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 1168