ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />
will be issuing bonds, it may hedge the risk of changes in the long-term interest rate<br />
from the date it decides to issue the bonds to the date the bonds are issued. If longterm<br />
interest rates go up, the bond will be issued either at a higher rate or with a<br />
higher discount or smaller premium than was originally expected. The higher rate<br />
being paid or decrease in proceeds is normally offset by the gain on the hedge. If<br />
long-term interest rates go down, the bond will be issued either at a lower rate or<br />
with a higher premium or a smaller discount than was originally expected. The lower<br />
rate being paid or increase in proceeds is normally offset by the loss on the hedge.<br />
For example, in August 2000 Entity R decided it would issue CU200 million sevenyear<br />
bonds in January 2001. Entity R performed historical correlation studies <strong>and</strong><br />
determined that a seven-year treasury bond adequately correlates to the bonds Entity<br />
R expected to issue, assuming a hedge ratio of 0.93 futures contracts to one debt unit.<br />
Therefore, Entity R hedged the anticipated issue of the bonds by selling (shorting)<br />
CU186 million worth of futures on seven-year treasury bonds. From August 2000 to<br />
January 2001 interest rates increased. The short futures positions were closed in<br />
January 2001, the date the bonds were issued, <strong>and</strong> resulted in a CU1.2 million gain<br />
that will offset the increased interest payments on the bonds <strong>and</strong>, therefore, will<br />
affect surplus or deficit over the life of the bonds. The hedge qualifies as a cash flow<br />
hedge of the interest rate risk on the forecast issue of debt.<br />
F.2.3 Hedge Accounting: Core Deposit Intangibles<br />
Is hedge accounting treatment permitted for a hedge of the fair value exposure<br />
of core deposit intangibles?<br />
It depends on whether the core deposit intangible is generated internally or acquired<br />
(e.g., as part of an entity combination).<br />
Internally generated core deposit intangibles are not recognized as intangible assets<br />
under IPSAS 31, “Intangible Assets.” Because they are not recognized, they cannot<br />
be designated as a hedged item.<br />
If a core deposit intangible is acquired together with a related portfolio of deposits,<br />
the core deposit intangible is required to be recognized separately as an intangible<br />
asset (or as part of the related acquired portfolio of deposits) if it meets the<br />
<strong>recognition</strong> criteria in IPSAS 31. A recognized core deposit intangible asset could be<br />
designated as a hedged item, but only if it meets the conditions in paragraph 98,<br />
including the requirement in paragraph 98 that the effectiveness of the hedge can be<br />
measured reliably. Because it is often difficult to measure reliably the fair value of a<br />
core deposit intangible asset other than on initial <strong>recognition</strong>, it is unlikely that the<br />
requirement in paragraph 98(d) will be met.<br />
F.2.4 Hedge Accounting: Hedging of Future Foreign Currency<br />
Revenue Streams<br />
Is hedge accounting permitted for a currency borrowing that hedges an<br />
expected but not contractual revenue stream in foreign currency?<br />
IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 1214