ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />
question would be reported in the IPSAS 30.25 disclosures separately for each type<br />
of hedge.<br />
F.1.13 Hedging Instrument: Dual Foreign Currency Forward Exchange<br />
Contract<br />
Entity A’s functional currency is the Japanese yen. Entity A has a five-year<br />
floating rate US dollar liability <strong>and</strong> a ten-year fixed rate pound sterlingdenominated<br />
note receivable. The principal amounts of the asset <strong>and</strong> liability<br />
when converted into the Japanese yen are the same. Entity A enters into a single<br />
foreign currency forward contract to hedge its foreign currency exposure on<br />
both <strong>instruments</strong> under which it receives US dollars <strong>and</strong> pays pounds sterling at<br />
the end of five years. If Entity A designates the forward exchange contract as a<br />
hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge against the foreign currency exposure<br />
on the principal repayments of both <strong>instruments</strong>, can it qualify for hedge<br />
accounting?<br />
Yes. IPSAS 29.85 permits designating a single hedging instrument as a hedge of<br />
multiple types of risk if three conditions are met. In this example, the derivative<br />
hedging instrument satisfies all of these conditions, as follows.<br />
(a) The risks hedged can be identified clearly. The risks are the exposures to changes<br />
in the exchange rates between US dollars <strong>and</strong> yen, <strong>and</strong> yen <strong>and</strong> pounds,<br />
respectively.<br />
(b) The effectiveness of the hedge can be demonstrated. For the pound sterling<br />
loan, the effectiveness is measured as the degree of offset between the fair<br />
value of the principal repayment in pounds sterling <strong>and</strong> the fair value of the<br />
pound sterling payment on the forward exchange contract. For the US dollar<br />
liability, the effectiveness is measured as the degree of offset between the fair<br />
value of the principal repayment in US dollars <strong>and</strong> the US dollar receipt on<br />
the forward exchange contract. Even though the receivable has a ten-year life<br />
<strong>and</strong> the forward protects it for only the first five years, hedge accounting is<br />
permitted for only a portion of the exposure as described in Question F.2.17.<br />
(c) It is possible to ensure that there is specific designation of the hedging instrument<br />
<strong>and</strong> different risk positions. The hedged exposures are identified as the principal<br />
amounts of the liability <strong>and</strong> the note receivable in their respective currency of<br />
denomination.<br />
F.1.14 Concurrent Offsetting Swaps <strong>and</strong> Use of One as a Hedging<br />
Instrument<br />
Entity A enters into an interest rate swap <strong>and</strong> designates it as a hedge of the fair<br />
value exposure associated with fixed rate debt. The fair value hedge meets the<br />
hedge accounting criteria of IPSAS 29. Entity A simultaneously enters into a<br />
second interest rate swap with the same swap counterparty that has terms that<br />
fully offset the first interest rate swap. Is Entity A required to view the two<br />
IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 1212