22.12.2012 Views

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />

entity’s exposure to the variability in the present value of the future net cash flows<br />

before <strong>and</strong> after the transfer. The computation <strong>and</strong> comparison is made using as<br />

the discount rate an appropriate current market interest rate. All reasonably<br />

possible variability in net cash flows is considered, with greater weight being<br />

given to those outcomes that are more likely to occur.<br />

25. Whether the entity has retained control (see paragraph 22(c)) of the transferred<br />

asset depends on the transferee’s ability to sell the asset. If the transferee has the<br />

practical ability to sell the asset in its entirety to an unrelated third party <strong>and</strong> is able<br />

to exercise that ability unilaterally <strong>and</strong> without needing to impose additional<br />

restrictions on the transfer, the entity has not retained control. In all other cases,<br />

the entity has retained control.<br />

Transfers that Qualify for De<strong>recognition</strong> (see paragraph 22(a) <strong>and</strong> (c)(i))<br />

26. If an entity transfers a financial asset in a transfer that qualifies for<br />

de<strong>recognition</strong> in its entirety <strong>and</strong> retains the right to service the financial asset<br />

for a fee, it shall recognize either a servicing asset or a servicing liability for<br />

that servicing contract. If the fee to be received is not expected to compensate<br />

the entity adequately for performing the servicing, a servicing liability for the<br />

servicing obligation shall be recognized at its fair value. If the fee to be<br />

received is expected to be more than adequate compensation for the<br />

servicing, a servicing asset shall be recognized for the servicing right at an<br />

amount determined on the basis of an allocation of the carrying amount of<br />

the larger financial asset in accordance with paragraph 29.<br />

27. If, as a result of a transfer, a financial asset is derecognized in its entirety but<br />

the transfer results in the entity obtaining a new financial asset or assuming a<br />

new financial liability, or a servicing liability, the entity shall recognize the<br />

new financial asset, financial liability or servicing liability at fair value.<br />

28. On de<strong>recognition</strong> of a financial asset in its entirety, the difference between:<br />

(a) The carrying amount; <strong>and</strong><br />

(b) The sum of (i) the consideration received (including any new asset<br />

obtained less any new liability assumed) <strong>and</strong> (ii) any cumulative<br />

gain or loss that had been recognized directly in net assets/equity<br />

(see paragraph 64(b));<br />

shall be recognized in surplus or deficit.<br />

29. If the transferred asset is part of a larger financial asset (e.g., when an entity<br />

transfers interest cash flows that are part of a debt instrument, see<br />

paragraph 18(a)) <strong>and</strong> the part transferred qualifies for de<strong>recognition</strong> in its<br />

entirety, the previous carrying amount of the larger financial asset shall be<br />

allocated between the part that continues to be recognized <strong>and</strong> the part that<br />

is derecognized, based on the relative fair values of those parts on the date of<br />

IPSAS 29 1042

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!