ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />
bond issue, its bonds have a lower coupon than if they were not secured by a<br />
government guarantee. This is because the guarantee lowers the risk profile of<br />
the bonds for investors. The guarantee fee could be determined by using the<br />
credit spread between what the coupon rate would have been had the issue not<br />
been backed by a government guarantee <strong>and</strong> the rate with the guarantee in<br />
place. Where a fair value is obtainable either by observation of an active<br />
market or through another valuation technique, the entity recognizes the<br />
financial guarantee at that fair value in the statement of financial position <strong>and</strong><br />
recognizes an expense of an equivalent amount in the statement of financial<br />
performance. When using a valuation technique that is not based on<br />
observation of an active market an entity needs to satisfy itself that the output<br />
of any model is reliable <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>able.<br />
AG97. If no reliable measure of fair value can be determined, either by direct<br />
observation of an active market or through another valuation technique, an<br />
entity is required to apply the principles of IPSAS 19 to the financial<br />
guarantee contract at initial <strong>recognition</strong>. The entity assesses whether a<br />
present obligation has arisen as a result of a past event related to a<br />
financial guarantee contract whether it is probable that such a present<br />
obligation will result in a cash outflow in accordance with the terms of the<br />
contract <strong>and</strong> whether a reliable estimate can be made of the outflow. It is<br />
possible that a present obligation related to a financial guarantee contract<br />
will arise at initial <strong>recognition</strong> where, for example, an entity enters into a<br />
financial guarantee contact to guarantee loans to a large number of small<br />
enterprises <strong>and</strong>, based on past experience, is aware that a proportion of<br />
these enterprises will default.<br />
Subsequent Measurement of Financial Assets (paragraphs 47 <strong>and</strong> 48)<br />
AG98. If a financial instrument that was previously recognized as a financial<br />
asset is measured at fair value <strong>and</strong> its fair value falls below zero, it is a<br />
financial liability measured in accordance with paragraph 49.<br />
AG99. The following example illustrates the accounting for transaction costs on the<br />
initial <strong>and</strong> subsequent <strong>measurement</strong> of an available-for-sale financial asset.<br />
An asset is acquired for CU100 plus a purchase commission of CU2.<br />
Initially, the asset is recognized at CU102. The end of the reporting period<br />
occurs one day later, when the quoted market price of the asset is CU100. If<br />
the asset were sold, a commission of CU3 would be paid. On that date, the<br />
asset is measured at CU100 (without regard to the possible commission on<br />
sale) <strong>and</strong> a loss of CU2 is recognized in net assets/equity. If the availablefor-sale<br />
financial asset has fixed or determinable payments, the transaction<br />
costs are amortized to surplus or deficit using the effective interest method.<br />
If the available-for-sale financial asset does not have fixed or determinable<br />
payments, the transaction costs are recognized in surplus or deficit when the<br />
asset is derecognized or becomes impaired.<br />
1105<br />
IPSAS 29 APPLICATION GUIDANCE<br />
PUBLIC SECTOR