ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />
No. The condition that “the holder would not recover substantially all of its<br />
recognized investment” is not satisfied if the terms of the combined instrument<br />
permit, but do not require, the investor to settle the combined instrument in a manner<br />
that causes it not to recover substantially all of its recognized investment <strong>and</strong> the<br />
issuer has no such right. Accordingly, an interest-bearing host contract with an<br />
embedded interest rate derivative with such terms is regarded as closely related to the<br />
host contract. The condition that “the holder would not recover substantially all of its<br />
recognized investment” applies to situations in which the holder can be forced to<br />
accept settlement at an amount that causes the holder not to recover substantially all<br />
of its recognized investment.<br />
C.11 Embedded Derivatives: Reliable Determination of Fair Value<br />
If an embedded derivative that is required to be separated cannot be reliably<br />
measured because it will be settled by an unquoted equity instrument whose fair<br />
value cannot be reliably measured, is the embedded derivative measured at cost?<br />
No. In this case, the entire combined contract is treated as a financial instrument held for<br />
trading (IPSAS 29.14). If the fair value of the combined instrument can be reliably<br />
measured, the combined contract is measured at fair value. The entity might conclude,<br />
however, that the equity component of the combined instrument may be sufficiently<br />
significant to preclude it from obtaining a reliable estimate of the entire instrument. In<br />
that case, the combined instrument is measured at cost less impairment.<br />
Section D: Recognition <strong>and</strong> De<strong>recognition</strong><br />
D.1 Initial Recognition<br />
D.1.1 Recognition: Cash Collateral<br />
Entity B transfers cash to Entity A as collateral for another transaction with<br />
Entity A (e.g., a securities borrowing transaction). The cash is not legally<br />
segregated from Entity A’s assets. Should Entity A recognize the cash collateral it<br />
has received as an asset?<br />
Yes. The ultimate realization of a financial asset is its conversion into cash <strong>and</strong>,<br />
therefore, no further transformation is required before the economic benefits of the<br />
cash transferred by Entity B can be realized by Entity A. Therefore, Entity A<br />
recognizes the cash as an asset <strong>and</strong> a payable to Entity B while Entity B derecognizes<br />
the cash <strong>and</strong> recognizes a receivable from Entity A.<br />
D.2 Regular Way Purchase or Sale of a Financial Asset<br />
D.2.1 Trade Date vs. Settlement Date: Amounts to be Recorded for a<br />
Purchase<br />
How are the trade date <strong>and</strong> settlement date accounting principles in the St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
applied to a purchase of a financial asset?<br />
1179<br />
IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE<br />
PUBLIC SECTOR