22.12.2012 Views

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />

period. The exposure to changes in the forward interest rate is the same. For example, if<br />

the CU14,100 is reinvested at a fixed rate at the beginning of Period X2 for six months, it<br />

will be reinvested at 5.75 percent. The expected interest is based on the forward interest<br />

rates for Period X2 of 5.50 percent <strong>and</strong> for Period X3 of 6.00 percent, equal to a blended<br />

rate of 5.75 percent (1.055 × 1.060) 0.5 , which is the Period X2 spot rate for the next six<br />

months.<br />

However, only the expected interest from the reinvestment of the cash inflows or<br />

repricing of the gross amount for the first three-month period after the forecast<br />

transaction occurs is designated as being hedged. The expected interest being hedged is<br />

represented by the shaded cells. The exposure for the subsequent periods is not hedged.<br />

In the example, the portion of the interest rate exposure being hedged is the forward rate<br />

of 5.50 percent for Period X2. In order to assess hedge effectiveness <strong>and</strong> compute actual<br />

hedge ineffectiveness on an ongoing basis, the entity may use the information on hedged<br />

interest cash inflows in Schedule VI <strong>and</strong> compare it with updated estimates of expected<br />

interest cash inflows (e.g., in a table that looks like Schedule II). As long as expected<br />

interest cash inflows exceed hedged interest cash inflows, the entity may compare the<br />

cumulative change in the fair value of the hedged cash inflows with the cumulative<br />

change in the fair value of the hedging instrument to compute actual hedge effectiveness.<br />

If there are insufficient expected interest cash inflows, there will be ineffectiveness. It is<br />

measured by comparing the cumulative change in the fair value of the expected interest<br />

cash flows to the extent they are less than the hedged cash flows with the cumulative<br />

change in the fair value of the hedging instrument.<br />

Describing the Designation of the Hedging Relationship<br />

As mentioned previously, there are various matters that should be specified in the<br />

designation of the hedging relationship that complicate the description of the<br />

designation but are necessary to limit ineffectiveness to be recognized for accounting<br />

purposes <strong>and</strong> to avoid unnecessary systems changes <strong>and</strong> bookkeeping. The example<br />

that follows describes the designation more fully <strong>and</strong> identifies additional aspects of<br />

the designation not apparent from the previous illustrations.<br />

IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 1262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!