ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
ipsas 29—financial instruments: recognition and measurement - IFAC
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: RECOGNITION AND MEASUREMENT<br />
29.12(c)), does the equity kicker feature meet the definition of an embedded<br />
derivative even though it is contingent upon the future listing of the borrower?<br />
Yes. The economic characteristics <strong>and</strong> risks of an equity return are not closely<br />
related to the economic characteristics <strong>and</strong> risks of a host debt instrument (IPSAS<br />
29.12(a)). The equity kicker meets the definition of a derivative because it has a<br />
value that changes in response to the change in the price of the shares of the<br />
borrower, it requires no initial net investment or an initial net investment that is<br />
smaller than would be required for other types of contracts that would be expected to<br />
have a similar response to changes in market factors, <strong>and</strong> it is settled at a future date<br />
(IPSAS 29.12(b) <strong>and</strong> IPSAS 29.10(a)). The equity kicker feature meets the definition<br />
of a derivative even though the right to receive shares is contingent upon the future<br />
listing of the borrower. IPSAS 29.AG21 states that a derivative could require a<br />
payment as a result of some future event that is unrelated to a notional amount. An<br />
equity kicker feature is similar to such a derivative except that it does not give a right<br />
to a fixed payment, but an option right, if the future event occurs.<br />
C.5 Embedded Derivatives: Identifying Debt or Equity Instruments as Host<br />
Contracts<br />
Entity A purchases a five-year “debt” instrument issued by Entity B with a<br />
principal amount of CU1 million that is indexed to the share price of Entity C. At<br />
maturity, Entity A will receive from Entity B the principal amount plus or minus<br />
the change in the fair value of 10,000 shares of Entity C. The current share price is<br />
CU110. No separate interest payments are made by Entity B. The purchase price is<br />
CU1 million. Entity A classifies the debt instrument as available for sale. Entity A<br />
concludes that the instrument is a hybrid instrument with an embedded derivative<br />
because of the equity-indexed principal. For the purposes of separating an<br />
embedded derivative, is the host contract an equity instrument or a debt<br />
instrument?<br />
The host contract is a debt instrument because the hybrid instrument has a stated<br />
maturity, i.e., it does not meet the definition of an equity instrument (IPSAS 28.9 <strong>and</strong><br />
IPSAS 28.14). It is accounted for as a zero coupon debt instrument. Thus, in<br />
accounting for the host instrument, Entity A imputes interest on CU1 million over<br />
five years using the applicable market interest rate at initial <strong>recognition</strong>. The<br />
embedded non-option derivative is separated so as to have an initial fair value of<br />
zero (see Question C.1).<br />
C.6 Embedded Derivatives: Synthetic Instruments<br />
Entity A acquires a five-year floating rate debt instrument issued by Entity B. At<br />
the same time, it enters into a five-year pay-variable, receive-fixed interest rate<br />
swap with Entity C. Entity A regards the combination of the debt instrument <strong>and</strong><br />
swap as a synthetic fixed rate instrument <strong>and</strong> classifies the instrument as a held-tomaturity<br />
investment, since it has the positive intention <strong>and</strong> ability to hold it to<br />
maturity. Entity A contends that separate accounting for the swap is inappropriate<br />
IPSAS 29 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE 1176