06.09.2021 Views

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 CHAPTER 4. FLUIDS STATICS<br />

The second approximation for small C x is<br />

(<br />

P<br />

= lim 1 − C ) g<br />

RCx<br />

x<br />

h<br />

P 0 C x −>0 T 0<br />

= e − gh<br />

RT 0<br />

− gh2 gh<br />

C x RT<br />

2 T 2 e− 0<br />

− ... (4.59)<br />

0 R<br />

Equation (4.59) shows that the correction factor (lapse coefficient), C x , influences at<br />

only large values <strong>of</strong> height. It has to be noted that these equations (4.58) and (4.59)<br />

are not properly represented without the characteristic height. It has to be inserted to<br />

make the physical significance clearer.<br />

Equation (4.57) represents only the pressure ratio. For engineering purposes, it<br />

is sometimes important to obtain the density ratio. This relationship can be obtained<br />

from combining equations (4.57) and (4.52). The simplest assumption to combine these<br />

equations is by assuming the ideal gas model, equation (2.25), to yield<br />

ρ<br />

ρ 0<br />

= PT 0<br />

P 0 T =<br />

P<br />

P 0<br />

T<br />

{ }} {<br />

0<br />

(<br />

1 − C )<br />

x h (<br />

g {<br />

T<br />

) ( }} {<br />

RCx<br />

1+ C )<br />

x h<br />

T 0<br />

T<br />

Advance material can be skipped<br />

(4.60)<br />

4.3.4.2 The Stability Analysis<br />

It is interesting to study whether<br />

this solution (4.57) is stable and if so<br />

h + dh<br />

under what conditions. Suppose that<br />

for some reason, a small slab <strong>of</strong> material<br />

moves from a layer at height, h,<br />

h<br />

to layer at height h + dh (see Figure<br />

4.11) What could happen? There are Fig. -4.11. Two adjoin layers for stability analysis.<br />

two main possibilities one: the slab<br />

could return to the original layer or two: stay at the new layer (or even move further,<br />

higher heights). The first case is referred to as the stable condition and the second<br />

case referred to as the unstable condition. The whole system falls apart and does not<br />

stay if the analysis predicts unstable conditions. A weak wind or other disturbances can<br />

make the unstable system to move to a new condition.<br />

This question is determined by the net forces acting on the slab. Whether these<br />

forces are toward the original layer or not. The two forces that act on the slab are<br />

the gravity force and the surroundings pressure (buoyant forces). Clearly, the slab<br />

is in equilibrium with its surroundings before the movement (not necessarily stable).<br />

Under equilibrium, the body forces that acting on the slab are equal to zero. That is,<br />

the surroundings “pressure” forces (buoyancy forces) are equal to gravity forces. The<br />

buoyancy forces are proportional to the ratio <strong>of</strong> the density <strong>of</strong> the slab to surrounding<br />

layer density. Thus, the stability question is whether the slab density from layer h, ρ ′ (h)<br />

undergoing a free expansion is higher or lower than the density <strong>of</strong> the layer h + dh. If<br />

ρ ′ (h) >ρ(h + dh) then the situation is stable. The term ρ ′ (h) is slab from layer h that<br />

had undergone the free expansion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!