06.09.2021 Views

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

520 CHAPTER 12. COMPRESSIBLE FLOW 2–DIMENSIONAL<br />

It should be noted that, oblique shock becomes less “oblique” and more parallel when<br />

other effects start to kick in.<br />

12.3 Prandtl-Meyer Function<br />

12.3.1 Introduction<br />

As discussed in Chapter ?? when the deflection<br />

turns to the opposite direction <strong>of</strong> the flow, the<br />

flow accelerates to match the boundary condition.<br />

The transition, as opposed to the oblique<br />

shock, is smooth, without any jump in properties.<br />

Here because <strong>of</strong> the tradition, the deflection<br />

angle is denoted as a positive when it<br />

is away from the flow (see Figure 12.21). In<br />

a somewhat a similar concept to oblique shock<br />

there exists a “detachment” point above which<br />

this model breaks and another model has to<br />

be implemented. Yet, when this model breaks<br />

Flow<br />

direction<br />

positive<br />

angle<br />

maximum angle<br />

Fig. -12.21. The definition <strong>of</strong> the angle for<br />

the Prandtl–Meyer function.<br />

down, the flow becomes complicated, flow separation occurs, and no known simple<br />

model can describe the situation. As opposed to the oblique shock, there is no limitation<br />

for the Prandtl-Meyer function to approach zero. Yet, for very small angles,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> imperfections <strong>of</strong> the wall and the boundary layer, it has to be assumed to<br />

be insignificant.<br />

Supersonic expansion and isentropic compression<br />

(Prandtl-Meyer function), are an extension <strong>of</strong> the Mach line<br />

concept. The Mach line shows that a disturbance in a field<br />

<strong>of</strong> supersonic flow moves in an angle <strong>of</strong> μ, which is defined<br />

as (as shown in Figure 12.22)<br />

μ = sin −1 ( 1<br />

M<br />

)<br />

(12.63)<br />

μ<br />

c<br />

M<br />

1<br />

μ<br />

√<br />

M 2 − 1<br />

U<br />

Fig. -12.22. The angles <strong>of</strong><br />

the Mach line triangle.<br />

or<br />

μ = tan −1 1<br />

√<br />

M<br />

1<br />

− 1<br />

(12.64)<br />

A Mach line results because <strong>of</strong> a small disturbance in the wall contour. This Mach line<br />

is assumed to be a result <strong>of</strong> the positive angle. The reason that a “negative” angle is<br />

not applicable is that the coalescing <strong>of</strong> the small Mach wave which results in a shock<br />

wave. However, no shock is created from many small positive angles.<br />

The Mach line is the chief line in the analysis because <strong>of</strong> the wall contour shape<br />

information propagates along this line. Once the contour is changed, the flow direction<br />

will change to fit the wall. This direction change results in a change <strong>of</strong> the flow<br />

properties, and it is assumed here to be isotropic for a positive angle. This assumption,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!