06.09.2021 Views

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

488 CHAPTER 12. COMPRESSIBLE FLOW 2–DIMENSIONAL<br />

Unlike in the normal shock, here there are three possible pairs 1 <strong>of</strong> solutions to<br />

these equations. The first is referred to as the weak shock; the second is the strong<br />

shock; and the third is an impossible solution (thermodynamically) 2 . Experiments and<br />

experience have shown that the common solution is the weak shock, in which the shock<br />

turns to a lesser extent 3 .<br />

tan θ<br />

tan(θ − δ) = U 1n<br />

(12.7)<br />

U 2n<br />

The above velocity–geometry equations can also be expressed in term <strong>of</strong> Mach number,<br />

as<br />

and in the downstream side reads<br />

sin θ = M 1n<br />

M 1<br />

(12.8)<br />

sin(θ − δ) = M 2n<br />

(12.9)<br />

M 2<br />

Equation (12.8) alternatively also can be expressed as<br />

cos θ = M 1t<br />

(12.10)<br />

M 1<br />

And equation (12.9) alternatively also can be expressed as<br />

cos (θ − δ) = M 2t<br />

M 2<br />

(12.11)<br />

The total energy across a stationary oblique shock wave is constant, and it follows<br />

that the total speed <strong>of</strong> sound is constant across the (oblique) shock. It should be noted<br />

that although, U 1t = U 2t the Mach number is M 1t ≠ M 2t because the temperatures<br />

on both sides <strong>of</strong> the shock are different, T 1 ≠ T 2 .<br />

As opposed to the normal shock, here angles (the second dimension) have to<br />

be determined. The solution from this set <strong>of</strong> four equations, (12.8) through (12.11),<br />

is a function <strong>of</strong> four unknowns <strong>of</strong> M 1 , M 2 , θ, and δ. Rearranging this set utilizing<br />

geometrical identities such as sin α = 2 sin α cos α results in<br />

Angle Relationship<br />

[<br />

M 2 1 sin 2 ]<br />

θ − 1<br />

tan δ = 2 cot θ<br />

M 2 1 (k + cos 2θ)+2<br />

(12.12)<br />

1 This issue is due to R. Menik<strong>of</strong>f, who raised the solution completeness issue.<br />

2 The solution requires solving the entropy conservation equation. The author is not aware <strong>of</strong><br />

“simple” pro<strong>of</strong> and a call to find a simple pro<strong>of</strong> is needed.<br />

3 Actually this term is used from historical reasons. The lesser extent angle is the unstable angle<br />

and the weak angle is the middle solution. But because the literature referred to only two roots, the<br />

term lesser extent is used.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!