06.09.2021 Views

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

Basics of Fluid Mechanics, 2014a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

486 CHAPTER 12. COMPRESSIBLE FLOW 2–DIMENSIONAL<br />

a boundary condition on the flow in which the fluid/gas can react only by a sharp<br />

change in the flow direction. As it may be recalled, normal shock occurs when a wall is<br />

straight/flat (δ =0) as shown in Figure 12.1 due to disturbance. When the deflection<br />

angle is increased, the gas flow must match the boundary conditions. This matching<br />

can occur only when there is a discontinuity in the flow field. Thus, the direction <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flow is changed by a shock with an angle to the flow. This shock is commonly referred<br />

to as the oblique shock.<br />

Decreasing the deflection angle<br />

Prandtl<br />

Meyer<br />

Obliqueθ ν ∞ (k)<br />

max (k)<br />

Function<br />

Shock<br />

{ }} {0 ◦<br />

also requires the boundary conditions<br />

to match the geometry. Yet, for a negative<br />

deflection angle (in this section’s<br />

{ }} {<br />

No Shock<br />

Plane<br />

notation), the flow must be continuous.<br />

The analysis shows that the flow<br />

zone<br />

Inclination<br />

velocity must increase to achieve this<br />

Fig. -12.2. The regions where oblique shock or<br />

requirement. This velocity increase is<br />

Prandtl–Meyer function exist. Notice that both<br />

referred to as the expansion wave. As have a maximum point and a “no solution” zone,<br />

it will be shown in the next section, as which is around zero. However, Prandtl-Meyer function<br />

approaches closer to a zero deflection angle.<br />

opposed to oblique shock analysis, the<br />

increase in the upstream Mach number<br />

determines the downstream Mach number and the “negative” deflection angle.<br />

It has to be pointed out that both the oblique shock and the Prandtl–Meyer<br />

function have a maximum point for M 1 →∞. However, the maximum point for the<br />

Prandtl–Meyer function is much larger than the oblique shock by a factor <strong>of</strong> more than<br />

2. What accounts for the larger maximum point is the effective turning (less entropy<br />

production) which will be explained in the next chapter (see Figure (12.2)).<br />

12.1.1.1 Introduction to Zero Inclination<br />

What happens when the inclination<br />

angle is zero? Which model is correct<br />

to use? Can these two conflicting<br />

models, the oblique shock and the<br />

Prandtl–Meyer function, co-exist? Or<br />

perhaps a different model better describes<br />

the physics. In some books<br />

and in the famous NACA report 1135<br />

it was assumed that Mach wave and<br />

oblique shock co–occur in the same<br />

zone. Previously (see Chapter ??), it<br />

U 1n<br />

π/2 − θ<br />

θ − δ<br />

U 1t<br />

π<br />

U 2<br />

U U 1 2t<br />

U 2n<br />

Comparsion Line<br />

Fig. -12.3. A typical oblique shock schematic.<br />

was assumed that normal shock occurs at the same time. In this chapter, the stability<br />

issue will be examined in greater detail.<br />

θ<br />

δ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!