atw - International Journal for Nuclear Power | 2.2024
Internationale Entwicklungen und Trends
Internationale Entwicklungen und Trends
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Environment and Safety<br />
51<br />
According to a report by Fermi Energia, Estonia’s<br />
approach to nuclear EPZs is based on the following<br />
regulations [53], [54] :<br />
⁃ EPZs are defined by the Prefect, based on the recommendations<br />
of the IAEA, ASN, and IRSN, and they<br />
are based the characteristics of the SMRs, the potential<br />
consequences of an accident, and the local<br />
specificities.<br />
⁃ EPZs are divided into two sub-zones: the immediate<br />
response zone (ZRI), where urgent protective<br />
actions are planned and implemented without<br />
delay in case of an emergency, and the extended<br />
response zone (ZRE), where additional protective<br />
actions are prepared and implemented as needed,<br />
depending on the evolution of the situation.<br />
⁃ The ZRI covers a radius of 1 km around the SMR,<br />
and the ZRE covers a radius of 5 km. These distances<br />
may be adjusted according to the local context and<br />
the results of probabilistic safety studies.<br />
⁃ EPZs are regularly reviewed and updated, considering<br />
the feedback from exercises, the changes in<br />
the SMRs, and the advances in the scientific and<br />
technical knowledge.<br />
5. Methods used to determine the Emergency<br />
Planning Zone<br />
The simulation of SMR EPZ detection necessitates the<br />
utilization of a variety of instruments and methods to<br />
guarantee the safety and readiness of the surrounding<br />
regions. A variety of equipment and approaches are<br />
used in the computerized simulation of SMR EPZ<br />
detection to guarantee the (pre-incident) integrity and<br />
(existing) resilience of the surrounding areas. The<br />
following instruments and methods could be applied<br />
in this situation. Various studies have been done in line<br />
with the EPZ size determination and most researchers<br />
have focused on the “NEI methodology”; this is a<br />
generic method that can be adopted and used by the<br />
SMR developers and plant operating license applicants<br />
<strong>for</strong> establishing design specific and site-specific technical<br />
basis <strong>for</strong> SMR-appropriate EPZ [59] . The NEI proposed<br />
methodology stems from the NUREG-0396 sizing rationale<br />
and was utilized to determine the generic distance<br />
<strong>for</strong> plume exposure EPZ <strong>for</strong> existing plants [23] . In 2018,<br />
the SMR Regulators’ Forum worked on a two-year<br />
project to identify general principles that govern the<br />
size of the EPZ of SMRs. In addition to the EPZ, the<br />
group also identified principles that govern the siting<br />
criteria of SMRs with novel design considerations [46] .<br />
The IAEA working group reviewed the IAEA methodology<br />
in establishing EPZ size and found it sufficient in<br />
their own scope to be used to determine the size of the<br />
EPZ around a SMR [60]. The IAEA identified four<br />
different regions around a nuclear power plant that<br />
require preparation of emergency response planning<br />
procedures in advance - two emergency planning zones<br />
(EPZs) and two emergency planning distances (EPDs).<br />
These regions are described in the Table 6 below [42] .<br />
The IAEA also suggested distances <strong>for</strong> each EPZ as<br />
shown in the subsequent Table 7.<br />
The SMR working group gives detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding<br />
each of the steps involved in the generalized<br />
approach to determine EPZ distances summarized in<br />
the flow chart in Figure 4. The detailed description describes<br />
differences that may or may not exist among<br />
member states and factors that must be considered in<br />
each step of the approach. The steps are explained and<br />
broken down chronologically in the following Table 8.<br />
Emergency zone/distance<br />
Precautionary Action Zone<br />
(PAZ)<br />
Urgent Protective Action<br />
Planning zone (UPZ)<br />
Extended Planning Distance<br />
(EPD)<br />
Ingestion and Commodities<br />
Planning Distance (ICPD)<br />
Description in summary<br />
In this zone, comprehensive arrangements are made at the preparedness stage to<br />
notify the public and have the public start to take urgent protective actions and<br />
other response actions within one hour of the declaration of a General Emergency<br />
by the shift supervisor of the nuclear power plant.<br />
In this zone, comprehensive arrangements are made at the preparedness stage to<br />
notify the public and have the public start to take the urgent protective actions and<br />
other response actions within about one hour of the declaration of a General<br />
Emergency by the shift supervisor of the nuclear power plant.<br />
The distance to which arrangements are made at the preparedness stage so<br />
that upon declaration of a General Emergency: (a) instructions will be provided<br />
to reduce inadvertent ingestion; and (b) dose rate monitoring of deposition<br />
conducted to locate hotspots following a release which could require evacuation<br />
within a day and relocation within a week to a month.<br />
The distance to which arrangements are made at the preparedness stage so<br />
that upon declaration of a General Emergency instructions will be provided to:<br />
(a) place grazing animals on protected (e.g. covered) feed, (b) protect drinking water<br />
supplies that directly use rainwater (e.g. to disconnect rainwater collection pipes),<br />
(c) restrict consumption of non-essential local produce, wild-grown products (e.g.<br />
mushrooms and game), milk from grazing animals, rainwater and animal feed, and<br />
(d) stop distribution of commodities until further assessments are per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />
Tab. 6.<br />
EPZ zones/distances [60]<br />
Vol. 69 (2024)