01.03.2024 Views

atw - International Journal for Nuclear Power | 2.2024

Internationale Entwicklungen und Trends

Internationale Entwicklungen und Trends

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54<br />

<br />

Environment and Safety<br />

In 2015, NuScale <strong>Power</strong> developed a method <strong>for</strong><br />

establishing the technical basis <strong>for</strong> plume exposure EPZ<br />

at NuScale SMR facilities and drafted a Licensing Topic<br />

Report (LTR), however this method therein described<br />

in this LTR is redacted in the filed version. The LTR<br />

presents the design-specific EPZ sizing method <strong>for</strong><br />

the NuScale SMR, and this method is based on the<br />

NEI risk- in<strong>for</strong>med EPZ method and extends it to<br />

address the issue of assessing the appropriate accident<br />

sequences to be considered [61] . A safety evaluation of<br />

this report was per<strong>for</strong>med later in 2022 by the<br />

USNRC and subsequently, the LTR was approved by<br />

the USNRC [62] .<br />

The criteria <strong>for</strong> determining the EPZ <strong>for</strong> SMRs is<br />

typically defined by regulatory authorities and<br />

considers various factors to ensure the safety and protection<br />

of the public in the event of an emergency.<br />

Some of the criteria and corresponding approaches<br />

that are commonly considered <strong>for</strong> determining the<br />

EPZ <strong>for</strong> SMRs are shown in the following Table 9 [63] .<br />

Several researchers have also worked on EPZ methodology<br />

<strong>for</strong> SMRs, and their work is summarized in the<br />

following Table 10 and 11.<br />

Criteria<br />

Safety Analysis<br />

System analysis<br />

Accident Analysis<br />

Atmospheric<br />

Dispersion Models<br />

Atmospheric conditions<br />

Dose figure of merit<br />

Approach<br />

Deterministic or Probabilistic<br />

Reference SMR consideration<br />

Worst case scenario<br />

Diffusion of Plume<br />

Site specific, plant specific<br />

conditions plus atmospheric<br />

stability classes<br />

Total Effective Dose Equivalent<br />

(TEDE)<br />

Tab. 9.<br />

Guiding criteria <strong>for</strong> EPZ determination methods [63]<br />

Author (s) and Title Year Code Reactor type Methodology Main area of focus<br />

K. Kim et al,<br />

A study <strong>for</strong> establishment<br />

of Korean SMR EPZ Based<br />

on US SMR Approach [64], [65] 2021 MACCS2 SMART NEI EPZ setup<br />

methodology.<br />

PSA of source term<br />

categories<br />

J.C. de la Rosa Blul,<br />

Determination of<br />

Emergency Planning Zone<br />

Distances and scaling based<br />

criteria <strong>for</strong> downsized<br />

nuclear power plants [63] 2021 N/A iPWR SMR Scaling based criteria<br />

Use of plant specific data<br />

<strong>for</strong> dose consequence<br />

calculation<br />

Inverse method of extrapolating<br />

EPZ distances of<br />

reference, large NPP down<br />

to the SMR<br />

Plume pathway and it focused<br />

on accident analysis and PSA<br />

Comparison of radioactive<br />

releases from a large reactor<br />

and a small modular reactor<br />

T.S. Carless et al,<br />

Risk and regulatory<br />

con siderations <strong>for</strong> small<br />

modular reactor emergency<br />

planning zones based on<br />

passive decontamination<br />

potential [66] 2018 RASCAL<br />

Monte Carlo<br />

simulations<br />

iPWR<br />

Surry<br />

AP1000<br />

Radionuclide Inventory<br />

and Plant specifications<br />

Decontamination factors<br />

in containment<br />

Atmospheric dispersion<br />

This study focused on<br />

comparison of radioactive<br />

release from different reactor<br />

types and their overall impact<br />

to the environment<br />

U.S. NRC<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance-based<br />

emergency preparedness<br />

<strong>for</strong> SMRs, Non-Light-Water<br />

Reactors, and Non-<strong>Power</strong><br />

Production or utilization<br />

facilities [67] 2020 N/A SMR<br />

Non LWR<br />

D.W. Hummel et al.<br />

Radiation dose consequences<br />

of postulated<br />

limiting accidents in small<br />

modular reactors to in<strong>for</strong>m<br />

emergency planning zone<br />

size requirements [68] 2019 ADDAM code HTGR<br />

MSR<br />

LFR<br />

iPWR<br />

Regulatory guide<br />

Radiation dose<br />

consequences<br />

Identifies methods and procedures<br />

the staff of the USNRC<br />

considers acceptable <strong>for</strong> SMR to<br />

demonstrate compliance with<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance-based emergency<br />

preparedness requirements.<br />

Radiation dose conse quences<br />

arising from limiting accidents<br />

of various types of SMRs and<br />

study the dispersion of radionuclides<br />

to the atmosphere<br />

H. Ding et al.<br />

Development of Emergency<br />

Planning zone <strong>for</strong> high<br />

temperature gas-cooled<br />

reactor [55] 2017 MACCS-<br />

MELCOR<br />

Accident<br />

Consequence<br />

Code System<br />

HTR-PM<br />

Based on<br />

NUREG-0396 RG1.145<br />

The principles that should be<br />

applied during EPZ development<br />

are deter mined by considering<br />

regulations and practice.<br />

the methodology follows<br />

NUREG-0396<br />

Ausgabe 2 › März

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!