speech and respect - College of Social Sciences and International ...
speech and respect - College of Social Sciences and International ...
speech and respect - College of Social Sciences and International ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Struggle for Respect<br />
banned the book, Shahabuddin wrote triumphantly to The Times <strong>of</strong><br />
India, denouncing Rushdie as an "overrated Eurasian writer," the<br />
product <strong>of</strong> a "fatigued culture," spokesman for a West "which has<br />
not yet laid the ghost <strong>of</strong> the crusades to rest. . . ." He reserved his<br />
worst insults for the "Anglicised elite," the "pukka Sahibs," the<br />
"entire 'liberal establishment,' " while welcoming the slurs <strong>of</strong> Rushdie<br />
<strong>and</strong> his supporters: "Call us primitive, call us fundamentalists,<br />
call us superstititious barbarians." He refused to read the book: "I do<br />
not have to wade through a filthy drain to know what filth is." 20<br />
Rushdie responded in an open letter to Prime Minister Rajiv<br />
G<strong>and</strong>hi, stressing that the book was fiction, not history, <strong>and</strong> invoking<br />
the support <strong>of</strong> Indian newspapers, publishers, <strong>and</strong> booksellers,<br />
international organisations opposed to censorship, <strong>and</strong> "such eminent<br />
writers" as Kingsley Amis, Harold Pinter, Stephen Spender, <strong>and</strong><br />
Tom Stoppard. 21 He followed this with an article in The Illustrated<br />
Weekly <strong>of</strong> India, accusing G<strong>and</strong>hi <strong>of</strong> playing communalist politics.<br />
Perhaps you feel that by banning my fourth novel you are taking a<br />
long-overdue revenge for the treatment <strong>of</strong> your mother in my<br />
second; but can you be sure that Indira G<strong>and</strong>hi's reputation will<br />
endure better <strong>and</strong> longer than Midnight's Children? Are you<br />
certain that the cultural history <strong>of</strong> India will deal kindly with the<br />
enemies <strong>of</strong> The Satanic Verses? You own the present, Mr. G<strong>and</strong>hi;<br />
but the centuries belong to art. 22<br />
Nevertheless, most countries with substantial Muslim populations<br />
followed India in banning the book.<br />
British Muslims quickly took charge <strong>of</strong> the attack. In a book<br />
entitled Be Careful with Muhammad!, Shabbir Akhtar compared<br />
Rushdie's "calculated attempt to vilify <strong>and</strong> sl<strong>and</strong>er the Prophet <strong>of</strong><br />
Islam" with the abortive 1970s plot by Jewish extremists to blow up<br />
Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. Rushdie was a "literary terrorist,"<br />
who called the Prophet by the derogatory name Mahound, suggested<br />
that the Qu'ran was not divine revelation, applied the adjectives<br />
bum, scum, black monster <strong>and</strong> bastard to historical<br />
personalities, <strong>and</strong> had prostitutes take the names <strong>of</strong> Mohammed's<br />
twelve wives. "[A]ny Muslim who fails to be <strong>of</strong>fended by Rushdie's<br />
book ceases, on account <strong>of</strong> that fact, to be a Muslim." Christianity<br />
had exposed its weakness in failing to respond to "continual blasphemies."<br />
"Any faith which compromises its internal temper <strong>of</strong><br />
militant wrath is destined for the dustbin <strong>of</strong> history .... God does<br />
not guide a people who sell his signs for a paltry price." Raising the<br />
12