05.01.2013 Views

speech and respect - College of Social Sciences and International ...

speech and respect - College of Social Sciences and International ...

speech and respect - College of Social Sciences and International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Struggle for Respect<br />

banned the book, Shahabuddin wrote triumphantly to The Times <strong>of</strong><br />

India, denouncing Rushdie as an "overrated Eurasian writer," the<br />

product <strong>of</strong> a "fatigued culture," spokesman for a West "which has<br />

not yet laid the ghost <strong>of</strong> the crusades to rest. . . ." He reserved his<br />

worst insults for the "Anglicised elite," the "pukka Sahibs," the<br />

"entire 'liberal establishment,' " while welcoming the slurs <strong>of</strong> Rushdie<br />

<strong>and</strong> his supporters: "Call us primitive, call us fundamentalists,<br />

call us superstititious barbarians." He refused to read the book: "I do<br />

not have to wade through a filthy drain to know what filth is." 20<br />

Rushdie responded in an open letter to Prime Minister Rajiv<br />

G<strong>and</strong>hi, stressing that the book was fiction, not history, <strong>and</strong> invoking<br />

the support <strong>of</strong> Indian newspapers, publishers, <strong>and</strong> booksellers,<br />

international organisations opposed to censorship, <strong>and</strong> "such eminent<br />

writers" as Kingsley Amis, Harold Pinter, Stephen Spender, <strong>and</strong><br />

Tom Stoppard. 21 He followed this with an article in The Illustrated<br />

Weekly <strong>of</strong> India, accusing G<strong>and</strong>hi <strong>of</strong> playing communalist politics.<br />

Perhaps you feel that by banning my fourth novel you are taking a<br />

long-overdue revenge for the treatment <strong>of</strong> your mother in my<br />

second; but can you be sure that Indira G<strong>and</strong>hi's reputation will<br />

endure better <strong>and</strong> longer than Midnight's Children? Are you<br />

certain that the cultural history <strong>of</strong> India will deal kindly with the<br />

enemies <strong>of</strong> The Satanic Verses? You own the present, Mr. G<strong>and</strong>hi;<br />

but the centuries belong to art. 22<br />

Nevertheless, most countries with substantial Muslim populations<br />

followed India in banning the book.<br />

British Muslims quickly took charge <strong>of</strong> the attack. In a book<br />

entitled Be Careful with Muhammad!, Shabbir Akhtar compared<br />

Rushdie's "calculated attempt to vilify <strong>and</strong> sl<strong>and</strong>er the Prophet <strong>of</strong><br />

Islam" with the abortive 1970s plot by Jewish extremists to blow up<br />

Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. Rushdie was a "literary terrorist,"<br />

who called the Prophet by the derogatory name Mahound, suggested<br />

that the Qu'ran was not divine revelation, applied the adjectives<br />

bum, scum, black monster <strong>and</strong> bastard to historical<br />

personalities, <strong>and</strong> had prostitutes take the names <strong>of</strong> Mohammed's<br />

twelve wives. "[A]ny Muslim who fails to be <strong>of</strong>fended by Rushdie's<br />

book ceases, on account <strong>of</strong> that fact, to be a Muslim." Christianity<br />

had exposed its weakness in failing to respond to "continual blasphemies."<br />

"Any faith which compromises its internal temper <strong>of</strong><br />

militant wrath is destined for the dustbin <strong>of</strong> history .... God does<br />

not guide a people who sell his signs for a paltry price." Raising the<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!