07.01.2013 Views

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

344<br />

issues anchored in the specificity of their New York lives and the larger artists’ community<br />

here. The Fox is obviously one expression of this work. It has forced us into the real world, or<br />

to put it better, it has shown us that <strong>Art</strong> & Language spans two real worlds: and that the gulf<br />

between the two communities is, indeed, as wide as the Atlantic.<br />

How can we make the transition from a praxiological life-world in which our work along<br />

with us is commodified (i.e. money and fame) to one in which “payment” takes the form of an<br />

acknowledgment by the community in which one lives implicitly by the act of adaptation.<br />

That means seeing how one’s work affects the world in which one lives, and learning along with<br />

others from its effect, and appreciating that effect not as simply an extension of oneself (power)<br />

but as a part of a larger historical complexity which connects the location of your life with that<br />

of others. Perhaps it is here where one begins to understand the import of the (artistic) ideological<br />

collective of which <strong>Art</strong> & Language is a prototype and emerging model.<br />

4.<br />

. . . with the events of recent years Marxism has definitely entered a new phase of its<br />

history, in which it can inspire and orient analyses and retain a real heuristic value,<br />

but is certainly no longer true in the sense it was believed to be true.<br />

—Maurice Merleau-Ponty<br />

The shift from the individual craftsman to the “ideological community” has as its pivotal base<br />

an understanding of a changed sense of responsibility. It is one result of the generalizing aspect<br />

of theoretical work, paramount as it has been to <strong>Conceptual</strong> <strong>Art</strong>. Initially, as Harold Rosenberg<br />

suggests, CA was self-consciously historical. Particularly among the early <strong>Conceptual</strong> artists,<br />

we were united not by a shared involvement in the technical issues of painting, for instance,<br />

but rather by a collective sense of a historical location: a view of art overlooking the flatlands of<br />

painting and sculpture. In thinking of artist’s groups as a human community, one thinks of<br />

how painters are forced to underscore their differences from other painters; the struggles being<br />

how to maintain one’s own identity within the generalization of painting. In CA what was felt,<br />

in the beginning at least, was not a sense of solidarity among technicians—that was wide open<br />

with everyone trying to stay out of everyone else’s way—but rather a sense of solidarity in our<br />

sameness, what we shared: being members of the first generation to be young enough to be<br />

capable of breaking our ties with modernism. The myth of modernism, which includes painting<br />

and sculpture, collapsing at our heels, left only its shock waves: the sense of a more direct<br />

relationship with the cultural bias of western civilization, left for us to try to express in some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!