07.01.2013 Views

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 — What is,who constitutes the “general body”?—it was suggested that only those “working”<br />

qualify for inclusion,which would seem to rest on a formal question of a definition of “work.”<br />

DOCUMENT VIII, AUGUST 1976<br />

In 1975, (Provisional) <strong>Art</strong> & Language received an invitation from Carlo Ripa di Meana, the<br />

director of La Biennale di Venezia, to exhibit as part of the “Aperto” section. During spring<br />

1976, we discussed the production of a large red cloth banner to bear the following inscription<br />

in white: “Ars Longa, Vita Brevis Est. Welcome to Venice: the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie<br />

‘eternalizes’ local color.” The plan was to display the banner on the exterior of one of the venues<br />

of “Aperto.”<br />

Olle Granath, a curator associated with the Biennale, expressed his horror at the possibility<br />

of such an installation actually taking place. In a telegram dated 20 May and addressed to<br />

the group in New York, he stated: “I only want to communicate to you that there is no possibility<br />

to put your ‘banner’ outside the pavilion of the exhibition, it has to be put inside.” Flora<br />

Lewis reported on the Biennale in The New York Times of 25 August 1976, from which the<br />

present text is taken.<br />

Venice Biennale’s Revival Offers Vitality<br />

. . . Two competing,antagonistic American groups were also permitted to enter<br />

contributions.<br />

One,whose leader calls himself Joseph Kossuth [sic],brought a batch of huge posters headlined<br />

“Where Do You Stand?” Pointing out the importance of knowing one’s “social location,” it<br />

offers a series of multiple-choice pre-packaged reactions to the whole Biennale.<br />

They run the gamut from rejection of it all,because by the very fact of being organized it<br />

represents authority and is therefore anti-revolutionary,through varying degrees of artistic arrogance<br />

and philistine confusion (“nothing makes any sense to me” is one choice) to rejection of it<br />

all because art is a private matter and must not be tainted by social commentary or politics.<br />

The other American group,called The Fox,protested bitterly against such a leaven of humor.<br />

But Mr. di Meana managed to assuage them by allowing them to put up a huge red banner<br />

outside the old shipyard at Giudecca,where the “international contemporary” exhibition has been<br />

organized,and where graphics are to be shown next month. The banner proclaims,“Welcome to<br />

Venice: the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie ‘eternalizes’ local color.”<br />

michael corris inside a new york art gang 479

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!