07.01.2013 Views

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology - uncopy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

448<br />

The facts of who did what, how much they contributed and so on, are more or less well<br />

known. They are by no means a secret. The (small) degree of anonymity which the name origi-<br />

nally conferred continues to be, however, of historical significance.<br />

As the distribution of the journal and the teaching practice of the editors and others devel-<br />

oped, the conversation expanded and multiplied to include by 1971 (in England) Charles Harrison,<br />

Philip Pilkington, David Rushton, Lynn Lemaster, Sandra Harrison, Graham Howard, Paul<br />

Wood, and (in New York) Michael Corris and later Paula Ramsden, Mayo Thompson, Christine<br />

Koslov, Preston Heller, Andrew Menard and Kathryn Bigelow.<br />

The name <strong>Art</strong> & Language sat precariously all over this. Its significance (or instrumentality)<br />

varied from person to person, alliance to alliance, (sub)discourse to (sub)discourse—from<br />

those in New York who produced The Fox (1974–76) to those engaged in music projects or to<br />

those who continued the original journal. There was a confusion: Terry Atkinson departed for his<br />

own reasons in 1974 and by 1976 a dialectically fruitful confusion had become a chaos of<br />

competing individualities and concerns.<br />

In a practice which tried to eschew the pomp and power of control, decisive action had<br />

become necessary if any vestige of <strong>Art</strong> & Language’s original ethos was to remain. There were<br />

those who saw themselves excluded from this who departed for individual occupations in teaching<br />

or as artists. There were others immune to the troubles who simply found different work.<br />

There were yet others whose departure was expedited by those whose practice had continued to<br />

be identified with the journal <strong>Art</strong>-Language and its artistic commitments. While musical activities<br />

continued with Mayo Thompson, and the literary conversational project continued (and continues)<br />

with Charles Harrison, by late 1976 the genealogical thread of this artistic work had been<br />

taken into the hands of Michael Baldwin and Mel Ramsden, with whom it remains.<br />

This paper was initially delivered by <strong>Art</strong> & Language (Michael Baldwin, Charles Harrison, Mel<br />

Ramsden) to the conference “Who’s Afraid of <strong>Conceptual</strong> <strong>Art</strong>,”at the Institute of Contemporary<br />

<strong>Art</strong>s, 19 March 1995. It was subsequently published in <strong>Art</strong>-Language, new series no. 2 (June<br />

1997), pp. 40–49. The only footnote in this text was initially published as “Summary”in <strong>Art</strong> &<br />

Language (Paris: Galerie Nationale du Jeu de Paume, 1993), pp. 147–148.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!