Challenger TAFE | Annual Report 2006 - Parliament of Western ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

34 Challenger TAFE | Annual Report 2006 Explanation: The average cost of $15.22 per SCH in 2006 shows an increase in cost over last year’s outcome of $14.60 ie $0.62 per SCH however it represents a substantially reduced cost from the target recorded in the Section 42 Forward Estimates of January 2006 ($15.77). Factors that infl uence the cost per SCH rise from 2005 but may not directly contribute to SCH production include: • the depreciation and amortisation of the College’s capital stock. Challenger TAFE has 21 sites across an extensive geographic region and the cost of these multiple facilities increases the infl uence of its capital elements on its operating costs. Depreciation is included in the cost of services and therefore infl uences the cost per SCH • consultancy services, especially those related to the development of overseas training programs. These have no Australian “on-shore” delivery, are externally funded and incur costs refl ected in the cost per SCH but do not contribute to the production of SCH • the contracted training provided to the Australian Submarine Corporation by Challenger TAFE. This affects the revenue and expenditure of the College but due to security arrangements, the Navy staff undertaking the submarine training program are not enrolled on Challenger TAFE’s systems. The program is taught by Challenger TAFE staff and the associated costs are refl ected in the cost of services but the enrolments are not included in the Student Curriculum Hours recorded on the CMIS. • Increases in valuation of capital stock. Table 8.1: Cost per SCH (Capital User Charge Included) Year SCH Cost per SCH 2002 4,180,540 $12.71 2003 4, 114,949 $13.53 2004 4,286,082 $14.17 2005 4,468,758 $14.60 2006 4,785,212 $15.22* * Explanatory Note: While the Cost per SCH of $15.22 in 2006 in relation to 2005, represented a $0.62 increase the result for 2006 was -$0.55 lower than the target set in the January 2006 Section 42 Forward Estimates. The reduced cost per SCH produced in comparison with the price established in the January Forward Estimates was accounted for by the 0.53% delivery of contracted training at a lower cost than that estimated.
Figure 8.2: Cost per SCH 2002-2006 (including Capital User Charge) Challenger TAFE | Annual Report 2006 35 KEY INDICATORS OF PERFORMANCE EFFECTIVENESS Challenger TAFE provides four KPI measures of effectiveness, including data based upon NCVER Graduate Satisfaction and Graduate Employment Outcomes from 2004. This material was available in 2005 but not made available in 2004 or 2006; therefore internal measures of effectiveness have been included below to supplement the four key measures provided. Achievement of College Profi le (%) using 2006 enrolment data confi rmed at 17 February 2007 from Challenger TAFE’s College’s Management Information System (CMIS) enrolment data. Student Satisfaction (%) using data from the WA government contracted annual 2006 Student Satisfaction Survey conducted by contractor Colmar Brunton Intelligence. Note: In previous years the College has been able to report on Graduate Satisfaction (%) using data from the Student Outcomes Survey that is conducted Australia-wide and contracted to NCVER. This arrangement was discontinued in 2004 (for 2003 Graduates) and resumed on a bi-annual basis from 2005. No data was provided in 2006 on the 2005 graduates. Similarly, the Graduate Employment (%) using data from the Student Outcomes Surveys conducted Australia wide and contracted to NCVER to complete were not available in 2004 (for 2003 Graduates) or 2006 (for 2005 Graduates) having been resumed on a biennial basis from 2005.
Page 1 and 2: Challenger TAFE | Annual Report 200
Page 3 and 4: The Hon Mark McGowan Minister for E
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTS Challenger TAFE | Annual R
Page 7 and 8: CHALLENGER TAFE IN WESTERN AUSTRALI
Page 9 and 10: 7 Kadadjiny Mia - Centre for Aborig
Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER 2 - BETTER PLANNING: BETTER
Page 15 and 16: 2.3 The Environment From State Goal
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 3 - KEY PRIORITIES FOR TAFE
Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER 4 - CHAIRPERSON’S REPORT
Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 7 - OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS
Page 29 and 30: Table 7.2 All delivery 2006 by fund
Page 31 and 32: INDEPENDENT AUDIT OPINION To the Pa
Page 33: Key Performance Indicators Challeng
Page 37 and 38: Figure 8.4: Targeted Profi le Achie
Page 43 and 44: Figure 8.11: Graduate Labour Market
Page 45 and 46: Figure 8.13 Profi le to Non-Profi l
Page 47 and 48: Table 8.18 Total Indigenous Student
Page 49 and 50: Figure 8.22 Comparison of Customer
Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 9 - MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE 9.
Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 10 - CUSTOMER FOCUS Challen
Page 59 and 60: 10.1.1.1 CareerConnect, Jan-Nov 200
Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER 11. OUTPUT REPORTS Challeng
Page 75 and 76: CHAPTER 12 - STATEMENT OF COMPLIANC
Page 83 and 84: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CHALLENGER TAF
Page 85 and 86:
Challenger TAFE | Annual Report 200
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Challenger TAFE NOTES TO THE FINANC
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115:
show all

Challenger TAFE | Annual Report 2006 - Parliament of Western ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?