AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
138 saturday afternoon <strong>AMS</strong> <strong>Philadelphia</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />
SERIAL “TYRANNY” WITH A CHUBBY CHECKER<br />
TWIST: SCHUMAN’S SEVENTH SYMPHONY AND<br />
QUESTIONS OF HISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHY<br />
Steve Swayne<br />
Dartmouth College<br />
I discuss four interrelated topics that emerge from the compositional history and reception<br />
of William Schuman’s Symphony no. 7 (1960): the traces of the <strong>Philadelphia</strong> Orchestra as the<br />
work’s original commissioner; the impact of serialism in America in the late 1950s; the concurrent<br />
impact of popular music in Schuman’s life and work; and recent attempts to reinterpret<br />
those forces upon music from this period in <strong>American</strong> history.<br />
In October 1954 the Koussevitzky Music Foundation, on behalf of the Boston Symphony<br />
Orchestra, commissioned Schuman to compose a work in honor of the Orchestra’s seventyfifth<br />
anniversary. Schuman initially imagined a work for chorus and orchestra, but by 1958 he<br />
had decided on a piece for instruments only. The work itself was premiered in October 1960,<br />
its delay explained in part by Schuman’s decision to accept a commission from the <strong>Philadelphia</strong><br />
Orchestra in 1959. Through letters, holographs, and the music itself, I will first explain<br />
how and why this never-performed <strong>Philadelphia</strong> work mutated into the Seventh Symphony.<br />
Second, I will discuss a previously unknown and contemporaneous manuscript in which<br />
Schuman experimented with serial techniques. This period also finds Schuman writing to two<br />
other composers who were employing serialism at the time (George Rochberg in his Second<br />
Symphony of 1956 and Aaron Copland in his Piano Fantasy of 1957). The manuscript, the<br />
correspondence with Rochberg and Copland, Schuman’s personal study of the music of Webern<br />
in 1959, and occasional references to twelve-tone organization in the Symphony all show<br />
Schuman struggling to essay serialism’s place in late 1950s America.<br />
Third, I will position Schuman against the revisionist historiography advanced by Joseph<br />
Straus in his articles and book about twelve-tone music in the United States. As Straus himself<br />
states, “we should focus on providing thicker descriptions of the full range of musical activity—histories<br />
that acknowledge modernist styles, including twelve-tone serialism, as vibrant<br />
strands within the postmodern musical fabric.” (Straus, 2008: 390) In revealing the tensions<br />
Schuman expressed and experienced during these years, I will assert that, while a serial “tyranny”<br />
may not ineluctably emerge from the documents and performances of the day, a certain<br />
serial agita was undeniably felt and transmitted by Schuman at the time.<br />
Lastly, I will look at some of the serial gestures found in Bernstein’s contemporaneous theater<br />
music as well as correspondence from Schuman to the publisher of one of his Tin Pan<br />
Alley songs and show that Schuman, like Bernstein, hoped to expand the repertoire of popular<br />
music of the day. I will join with Straus in arguing against a Darmstadt model for serialism<br />
in the United States and argue that, for <strong>American</strong> composers of the late 1950s, the rise of rock<br />
presented a competing challenge to serialism. I will conclude with a final examination of the<br />
Seventh Symphony and consider how intersections of twelve-tone and popular sounds in this<br />
work as well as in the lives of Schuman and other composers from this era allow for multiple<br />
approaches to interpreting this music.