14.01.2013 Views

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Abstracts</strong> Friday morning 67<br />

Focusing on gustavo iii, this paper identifies the unofficial censors (they turn out to be the<br />

Director of the Police, a high-ranking lawyer, the impresario’s right-hand man, and even the<br />

impresario himself), determines their political or religious function, and interprets some of<br />

their emendations. In addition, the paper will show that the unofficial censors worked together<br />

much more closely than we have so far believed (handing the libretto back and forth among<br />

themselves) and that they censored much more thoroughly than their official colleagues. They<br />

were not satisfied with simply eradicating problematic words or phrases but returned to the<br />

same passage time and again, hoping to improve it. In the case of Un ballo in maschera, where<br />

the composer and librettist had a chance to react to the censors’ work, the result was on occasion<br />

surprisingly good.<br />

PoPulAr genres in the eArly tWentieth century<br />

David Ake, university of nevada, reno, chair<br />

SCHEMING YOUNG LADIES: IMAGES OF FEMALE<br />

MUSICIANS IN RAGTIME-ERA NOVELTY SONGS<br />

Larry Hamberlin<br />

Middlebury College<br />

“As late as the 1920s,” wrote Jacques Barzun in Music in <strong>American</strong> Life, “untutored popular<br />

sentiment regarded the playing of music as the occupation of wretched professionals and<br />

scheming young ladies.” Ragtime-era novelty (i.e., comic) songs about female musicians, and<br />

especially singers, provide some clues as to why such a negative stereotype was both widespread<br />

and long-lived. Coinciding with the peak of the women’s suffrage movement, these<br />

songs may represent an antisuffragist backlash, lampooning “scheming” women’s quest to<br />

pursue careers in music, where their financial independence presented a threat to patriarchal<br />

norms.<br />

Yet the ridicule of women singers did not end with the Nineteenth Amendment. Ragtime<br />

songs set the pattern for the still-current soprano joke, which may express other musicians’<br />

resentment of the diva’s power over audiences. Moreover, the soprano voice itself may be an<br />

object of psychological discomfort that male listeners might want to defuse with humor. Yet<br />

another cause of male discomfiture is an association of female display with disreputable entertainments<br />

such as the burlesque show—self-display, even on the operatic stage, some songs<br />

imply, is intrinsically indecent.<br />

Because so many of these songs focus on “unfeminine” ambition, voice students and other<br />

aspiring singers feature prominently among the protagonists. This paper considers in turn<br />

portraits of voice students, amateur singers, and professional singers, tracking the increasingly<br />

negative portrayals of women’s aspirations, and concludes by comparing these songs with a<br />

few novelties about male singers, which suggest that vocal display was increasingly perceived<br />

as a feminine-gendered social practice.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!