AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
82 Friday afternoon <strong>AMS</strong> <strong>Philadelphia</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />
discursive narratives surrounding each woman and exposing the web of social and political<br />
interactions that these singers negotiated both on- and off-stage.<br />
The panel reveals how reviewers, historians, and biographers set these four women’s performed<br />
selves in opposition to their performed characters, a clash that leads, in Goffman’s<br />
terminology, to a discrediting of their performed selves. Broadening the important work of<br />
Southern (1971), Jackson (1979), and the recent collection of essays by Hayes and Williams<br />
(2007), the panel elucidates some of the historical musical contributions of these four seminal<br />
African <strong>American</strong> women singers from the nineteenth century to the 1980s, and challenges<br />
our discipline to more fully incorporate methodologies of performance studies and more rigorously<br />
interrogate the myriad meanings of “performance.”<br />
THE “BLACK SWAN” IN AMERICA: A MID-NINETEENTH CENTURY<br />
RECEPTION STUDY OF ELIZABETH TAYLOR GREENFIELD<br />
Julia Chybowski<br />
University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh<br />
Born into slavery decades before the Civil War, Elizabeth Taylor Greenfield toured in North<br />
America and England in 1850s and 1860s under the name of “The Black Swan.” Although she<br />
is proclaimed America’s first black concert singer in James Trotter’s 1881 publication, Music<br />
and Some Highly Musical People, and subsequent histories which almost exclusively rely<br />
on Trotter’s narrative, scholars have largely overlooked her mid-nineteenth century reception.<br />
Building upon my previous work on Greenfield’s English sojourn and her position in<br />
the trans-Atlantic abolition movement, this presentation explores reception of her 1851–1853<br />
<strong>American</strong> tour against the backdrop of a rising mid-century interest in slave culture among<br />
white Northerners, and legislative struggles to define race in the early 1850s.<br />
There are many challenges involved in researching a musician who, although prominent<br />
in her lifetime, has almost been completely lost to history. We know few basic details of<br />
Greenfield’s biography, and her authoritative voice is not in any way preserved. Yet, hundreds<br />
of newspaper reviews document an enthusiastic reception of her mid-century musical performances.<br />
Greenfield sang sentimental ballads, Stephen Foster songs and English versions<br />
of Italian opera arias—that is, the music of upper-class parlors where musical women in the<br />
image of Victorian “singing birds” presided, and of the concert stages that presented European<br />
prima donnas. Greenfield toured in the U.S. simultaneously with the “Swedish Nightingale,”<br />
Jenny Lind, and this historical coincidence provided reviewers with fodder for poignant contrast.<br />
Not only did they judge Greenfield’s accomplishments with favorable comparisons to<br />
her much more famous contemporary, but they used Lind as a foil to the “Black Swan.”<br />
This project builds upon other studies of nineteenth century female African <strong>American</strong><br />
musicians such as Marie Selika, Sissieretta Jones, and Nellie Brown Mitchell. In order to<br />
present Elizabeth Taylor Greenfield as an important precursor to these later musicians, I will<br />
emphasize recurring themes in reviews that became long-standing conventions in review of<br />
African <strong>American</strong> female voices, such as reviewers’ insistence that the African <strong>American</strong> female<br />
voice be heard as spiritual, powerful, and natural and that her evident musicality be<br />
met with qualified praise. Moreover, reviews tie their characterizations of Greenfield’s voice,<br />
physical appearance, and degree of cultivation measured with the ideology of racial uplift to<br />
their speculation over her “true” racial identity. On one hand, reviewers insist on hearing her<br />
as an “authentic” slave voice, at a time when realist fiction and published slave narratives were