AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Abstracts</strong> saturday morning 109<br />
“THIS IS AMERICA”: JIMI HENDRIX’S TWO-YEAR FASCINATION<br />
WITH THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL ANTHEM<br />
Mark Clague<br />
University of Michigan<br />
Jimi Hendrix’s August 18, 1969 performance of “The Star-Spangled Banner” elicits either<br />
hagiographic praise or disgust. It is not only the climactic icon of Woodstock, but is arguably<br />
the most powerful symbol of rock’s potential for protest. The Hendrix Banner is rock. Long<br />
before it was posted to YouTube or videogamers could relive the experience on Guitar Hero<br />
2, the performance was ingrained in America’s living cultural memory, propelled by commemorative<br />
recordings as well as the 1970 documentary film Woodstock. Yet its very status as<br />
legendary also serves to obscure, resulting in both an exaggeration of the Woodstock Banner’s<br />
influence as well as a fundamental misunderstanding, and possibly a gross underestimation, of<br />
the political potential of Hendrix’s art. Hendrix’s Banner is so well known as to be unknown.<br />
Its reputation has propelled the event far beyond the bounds of history into the realm of legend<br />
with its attendant misinformation and misrepresentation.<br />
By revisiting the Woodstock Banner not as a single, ecstatic improvisation, but as a particular<br />
realization of an ongoing two-year relationship with the song, the full range and subtlety<br />
of Hendrix’s artistic engagement with the anthem, both musical and political, comes into<br />
better focus. Rather than a single explosive event, the Hendrix Banner should be thought of<br />
as a simmering process of celebration and commentary brought forth in more than fifty performances,<br />
beginning in August 1968, over a year before Woodstock, and continuing through<br />
August 1970, shortly before Hendrix’s death on September 18, 1970. This broader analysis<br />
reveals the Hendrix Banner to be an ongoing reframing of the anthem’s symbolism in a flexible<br />
rearrangement deployed most frequently in live concerts but also in studio recordings<br />
to depict the United States of America and thus reify its tensions to make them more vivid<br />
and thus inspire attempts at resolution. For Hendrix, “The Star-Spangled Banner” might be<br />
thought of as a kind of sonic national snapshot, taken repeatedly and often to catalog the state<br />
of the nation and suggest the need for change.<br />
Based in over forty surviving recordings (most from underground audience recordings),<br />
this paper mines the little-known Hendrix performances of the anthem for evidence that<br />
helps locate their meaning. Using formal analysis of the broad variety of arrangements combined<br />
with contextual evidence including the guitarist’s stage banter and the position of the<br />
Banner within his set repertoire, I conclude that Hendrix’s Banner operates on three competing<br />
levels: musical showmanship, social critique, and patriotic hope. I dispel several myths<br />
surrounding the Hendrix Banner, including that it was a singular, improvisatory event, that<br />
it is a solo (in fact, it is a duet with drummer Mitch Mitchell), and that it is meaningless (a<br />
claim made at times by Hendrix himself). The historical and aesthetic trajectory of Hendrix’s<br />
Banner enriches not only our understanding of a compelling and highly original work of art,<br />
but offers a case study in the political power of music.