14.01.2013 Views

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Abstracts</strong> saturday afternoon 141<br />

“IN POINTED AND DIAMETRICAL OPPOSITION TO THE<br />

RULES OF TRUE TASTE”: THE GOTHICK MUSICAL STYLE<br />

AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF BRITAIN<br />

Ardal Powell<br />

Pendragon Press<br />

The Gothick strain in the literature, painting, architecture, and decoration of the newly-<br />

United Kingdom portrayed a mythic national past rooted in an imagined era of passion and<br />

disorder. Encompassing, in Sir Walter Scott’s phrase, “whatever was in pointed and diametrical<br />

opposition to the rules of true taste,” the style provided distinctively native antithesis to<br />

continental classical purity.<br />

This paper outlines a parallel but hitherto unremarked movement in music, manifested in<br />

professional and domestic performance as well as in British musical discourse. It focuses on<br />

the practices of amateur flute-playing among middle-class men during a surge in the flute’s<br />

popularity during the 1820s, and on the controversial style of their Wellington, the English<br />

flutist Charles Nicholson (1795–1837).<br />

The first native professional instrumentalist to achieve star status in Britain, Nicholson<br />

presented a manly, sentimental, and heroic persona sharply distinguished from those of nonnative<br />

artists, especially the polished French instrumentalists who visited London in the first<br />

two decades of the nineteenth century. I argue that aspects of his repertoire and performance<br />

practice that contemporaries identified as “Gothick” provide the key to appreciating Nicholson’s<br />

distinctiveness, to understanding the polemics over his “taste and judgement,” and to<br />

evaluating discourse on musical ideals and practice during a formative period of the British<br />

national self-image.<br />

With precise reference to musical notation and to instructions for performance practice, I<br />

illustrate a distinction between “embellishment” and “expression” that privileged pathos and<br />

sentimentality over classical structure and bravura. I refer to the distinctive techniques of “expression”<br />

Nicholson documented in unprecedented detail in several tutors and study volumes<br />

published from 1816 to 1836, in particular his painstakingly-notated version of the Scotch air<br />

“Roslin Castle,” to show how the Gothick taste was manifested and perceived in the precise<br />

execution of tone, ornaments, inflections, articulation, and playing posture. Contrasting these<br />

practices with those of foreign flutists visiting London, as documented both in published criticism<br />

and in French and German method books, I make clear the wide gulf between British<br />

and continental tastes.<br />

I argue that Nicholson’s reputation as “our first English artist on his instrument” (The Athanaeum)<br />

rests not only on his birth and his distinctively British style but also on enterprises in<br />

publishing and instrument manufacture that made his practices imitable. The special flute design<br />

he licensed for manufacture, together with his method books, notated expression, public<br />

concerts, and private lessons, afforded a host of male amateur flutists a script for re-playing<br />

his distinctive sounds, actions, and body, and thus to enact a uniquely British, male, Protestant,<br />

middle-class set of manners and feelings at a time when the distinction of this emergent<br />

social class from foreigners, women, Catholics, and the aristocracy held acute political and<br />

social significance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!