AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Abstracts</strong> saturday afternoon 143<br />
emergent in French culture in the previous century, when new forms of sexually transgressive<br />
material invaded the print market and the new word “obscène” or existing ones such as<br />
“lascive” or “impudique” were deployed in a rapidly developing debate over the moral acceptability<br />
of sexual vocabulary and images. Secular vocal music played a role in this discourse,<br />
evident in Protestant polemic that identified the French royal court as a prime location for the<br />
performance of chansons lascives that encouraged illicit thoughts, and worse, the translation<br />
of those thoughts into immoral actions. These accusations are supported by the large number<br />
of chansons with sexually explicit texts published by the royal music printers, who obtained<br />
most of their repertory from court sources. But we know little about the performance contexts<br />
for such pieces, under what circumstances they might be considered either morally legitimate<br />
or obscene, and how they might figure in a broader history of obscenity in early modern<br />
France.<br />
In this paper, I first approach these questions through the elaborate wedding scene that<br />
closes Jacques Gohory’s novel, Le trezieme livre d’Amadis de gaule (1571). Gohory describes the<br />
large-scale public festivities that celebrate the wedding, then moves on to depict a banquet<br />
during which several songs with explicit lyrics are performed. The chanson texts are included,<br />
and he provides detailed descriptions of listeners’ reactions, making careful distinctions according<br />
to the auditors’ gender and social rank, and emphasizing how the songs inspire shock<br />
or laughter, or spur participants to enact the erotic content of their texts. Although fictional,<br />
Gohory’s episode has links with the real wedding of Charles IX, celebrated at the French<br />
court the previous year. And the chanson texts overlap significantly with those in the Musique<br />
(1570) of the royal musician Guillaume Costeley, including its juxtaposition of classicizing<br />
epithalamium with erotic chansons. Dedicated to Charles IX, the collection features prefatory<br />
material by Gohory, suggesting that we can look to Costeley’s music for further insights into<br />
how the performance of sexually transgressive pieces contributed to the blurring of representation<br />
and action promoted by their texts.<br />
Court festivities emerge as a convincing context for the sexually explicit songs that circulated<br />
in contemporary French song prints. These events often featured play around the limits<br />
of decency, serving important functions in defining court practice and affirming courtly identities.<br />
I argue that rather than representing a species of Bahktinian carnivalesque in which<br />
normal social distinctions are levelled, as has sometimes been claimed, these songs were used<br />
to mark and reinforce courtly hierarchies of class and gender. They also brought music into a<br />
broader debate around the moral character of court life, in which the chanson lascive figures as<br />
a potential battleground for contemporary debates on the nature of the obscene.<br />
THE HISSING OF PAGIN: DIDEROT’S APOSTLE MEETS<br />
THE CABAL AT THE CONCERT SPIRITUEL<br />
Beverly Wilcox<br />
University of California, Davis<br />
The French violinist André-Noël Pagin, one of Tartini’s prize pupils, was hissed at the<br />
Concert Spirituel on Easter Sunday in 1750, and never played in public again. The concert<br />
review in the Mercure de France concealed this scandal by listing the entire program and then<br />
saying that “most of” the pieces “obtained repeated applause from the brilliant and numerous<br />
assembly.” Two years later, in the incipient stages of the querelle des bouffons, an anonymous<br />
pamphleteer demanded to know “for what purpose the nation, ungrateful to such a sublime