14.01.2013 Views

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Abstracts</strong> Friday morning 73<br />

Jong. Schat’s insistence that “the intention of the work remains an open question, which only<br />

the individual creativity of the spectator can extract” also reflects early Situationist emphasis<br />

upon “experimental life-play” as an antithesis to the passivity of the spectacle. It simultaneously<br />

marks the beginning of Schat’s re-evaluation of the social role of music, a re-evaluation that<br />

was to have a defining impact on the politicization of Dutch musical life in following years.<br />

FROM SOUND TO SPACE: LISTENING IN/TO RYOJI IKEDA’S MAtrix<br />

August Sheehy<br />

University of Chicago<br />

Since first garnering international attention with his album +/- (touch, 1996), Japanese<br />

composer and installation artist Ryoji Ikeda has been pushing the limits of both electronic<br />

music and the technologies used to create it. This paper examines Matrix [for rooms] (touch,<br />

2000), arguably the most focused example from Ikeda’s challenging oeuvre. Matrix, an exacting,<br />

hour-long collage of computer-generated sine waves, questions important concepts in<br />

musical discourse, including the role of technology, meaning, perception, and above all, notions<br />

of musical space.<br />

The terse liner notes for the piece read, “Matrix [for rooms] forms an invisible pattern that<br />

fills the listening space. The listener’s movements transform the phenomenon into his±her intrapersonal<br />

music.” Matrix is thus both music and installation, and the two concepts represent<br />

extreme senses in which it can be understood. In the first case, we might speak of listening to<br />

Matrix, as an aesthetically consumable musical product; in the latter, of listening in Matrix, as<br />

an acoustically defined space that a listener can explore. As the liner notes indicate, however,<br />

the difference is not merely discursive. Rather, it is precisely the listener’s perceptual inability<br />

to locate a sound source or to stabilize rhythm or pitch content—both shift unpredictably<br />

when the listener moves within the listening space—that draws discourses of musical space(s)<br />

into question.<br />

I present two readings of Matrix. The first is broadly ecological, drawing on psychoacoustics<br />

and evolutionary psychology to explain the perceptual instabilities in Matrix as auditory<br />

illusions. While I find this reading essentially correct, it falls short in two ways. First, by assuming<br />

a Newtonian/Cartesian space a priori, it fails to take the conceptual challenge posed<br />

by Matrix seriously; second, it fails to account for the musical, phenomenological, and technological<br />

discourses Matrix clearly solicits. Without simply discarding empirical evidence, I<br />

propose another way of thinking about Matrix, in which the concept of space is more tightly<br />

entwined with these discourses, by suggesting that Matrix recaptures a phenomenology of<br />

pre-conceptual perception. The listener’s inability to resolve temporal and spatial attributes of<br />

sonic events in Matrix closely simulates the poor perceptual resolution of human infants, as<br />

documented in psychological research. Extrapolating backwards, the space created by Matrix<br />

becomes a neo-natal world in which sounds have yet to resolve themselves into auditory objects<br />

with definite locations.<br />

Ikeda’s Matrix thus deconstructs rigid distinctions between physical and musical spaces,<br />

and between percept and concept. Its constantly morphing sound events also belie the binary<br />

logic of digital media, which is also often assumed to provide an accurate model for human<br />

cognition. Ultimately, I argue that Matrix exposes an illusory distinction between descriptive<br />

analysis and criticism by providing a phenomenological experience that defies assimilation by<br />

the terms of either discourse.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!