14.01.2013 Views

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Friday morning, 13 November<br />

Ars AntiquA Ars novA<br />

rebecca Baltzer, university of texas, Austin, chair<br />

THE COMPLETE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE STARY<br />

SACZ MANUSCRIPT AND ITS PLACE AMONG OTHER<br />

THIRTEENTH-CENTURY NOTRE DAME MANUSCRIPTS<br />

Katarzyna Grochowska<br />

University of Chicago<br />

The discovery, in Stary Sacz, Poland, of manuscript fragments preserving thirteenth-century<br />

Notre Dame polyphony was announced four decades ago. Yet, even though included in<br />

collective publications or mentioned in detailed scholarly articles, the manuscript is scarcely<br />

known to musicologists. The main cause for such indifference is the fragmentary form in<br />

which the manuscript is preserved. Like many medieval parchment sources, it was cut and<br />

reused as binding material. Additionally, access to the manuscript has been inhibited by the<br />

strict entrance rules to the Clarist Convent in Stary Sacz, its rightful owner. For forty years,<br />

this situation precluded the complete reconstruction of the manuscript. Furthermore, even<br />

some of the most basic attributes of the manuscript such as its dimensions, compilation and<br />

content have remained unconsidered. Because of the manuscript’s fragmentary nature and<br />

incomplete reconstruction, it has not been systematically included among the body of the<br />

thirteenth-century Notre Dame manuscripts, and for this reason discussion of it in the scholarly<br />

literature has led to only a fragmentary appreciation of it.<br />

Using PowerPoint images, I will present the complete reconstruction of the Stary Sacz manuscript,<br />

made possible thanks to the sustained generosity of the Convent’s Mother Superior. I<br />

will discuss important features that allow the precise placement of the Stary Sacz manuscript<br />

within the context of other thirteenth-century Notre Dame manuscripts. Its dimensions, established<br />

on the basis of eleven surviving folios, position it among the relatively numerous<br />

Notre Dame pocket-size manuscripts. Its content and particularly its motet fascicle situate it<br />

within the small circle of Parisian motet sources. Although the motet fascicle preserves four<br />

unica, it resembles early motet collections in which the works of Philip the Chancellor hold<br />

pride of place. However, one feature of the motet fascicle stands in sharp contrast to coeval<br />

polyphonic sources: the ordering of the motets. The twenty-four Stary Sacz motets are divided<br />

into two roughly equal-sized groups, which in turn are arranged into successive liturgical<br />

cycles. Heretofore, the motets’ arrangements have always been ordered either as one single<br />

liturgical cycle or alphabetically, where in both cases compositions were thought to have been<br />

assembled by numbers of voices. I will show through a detailed analysis of the manuscript and<br />

the music how the Stary Saczy motets point to previously unconsidered criteria that drove<br />

the arrangement of the pieces, namely the intrinsic qualities of the motets’ melodic lines. My<br />

conclusions underscore the significance of the Stary Sacz manuscript as, among other unique<br />

features, the only thirteenth-century Notre Dame source in which melody largely guides the<br />

ordering of its pieces. Though preserved in peripheral geographic territory, the Stary Sacz<br />

manuscript is central to an understanding of the musical criteria that may have played a role<br />

in the compilation of early Notre Dame manuscripts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!