14.01.2013 Views

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160 saturday evening <strong>AMS</strong> <strong>Philadelphia</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

whose father and brother had died in the concentration camps, mocked Death with the sarcasm<br />

of one who had also looked the Grim Reaper in the face. Despite the obvious differences<br />

in style and all external factors, there is an astonishing number of similarities between the two<br />

operas that I will attempt to explain by tracing the intellectual histories of the two librettos<br />

and invoking the theory of the absurd.<br />

BERND ALOIS ZIMMERMANN’S SoLdAteN, TEMPORAL<br />

PLURALISM, AND THE POLITICS OF RESISTANCE:<br />

RE-VOICING LENZ, BüCHNER, BERG<br />

Christopher Alan Williams<br />

Bowling Green State University<br />

When Bernd Alois Zimmermann’s opera die Soldaten premiered in February, 1965, it was<br />

hailed as a masterpiece of postwar modernism, and as an ideal distillation of the composer’s<br />

style, technique, and ideals, the most vivid embodiment of what he termed “musikalische<br />

Pluralismus.” But problems were also cited: the extraordinary difficulties it presented<br />

for performers, for audiences through its relentless loudness and morbid despair, and, for<br />

some <strong>American</strong> commentators, its uncomfortable fusion of serialism with “post-modern”<br />

evocations of jazz and multi-media collage techniques. From the standpoint of a German<br />

avant-garde then dominated by the pronouncements of Karlheinz Stockhausen and his circle<br />

(for <strong>American</strong> academics the most influential mouthpiece for European developments), a<br />

further problem resided in the work’s use of historical forms and “conventional” dramaturgy,<br />

which suggested a moribund dependence on tradition. Despite these many obstacles, the<br />

opera has benefited from repeated revival on both sides of the Atlantic, in at least five major<br />

productions, most recently in 2008, more than any other postwar opera not firmly rooted in<br />

the tonal tradition.<br />

Somewhat buried in debates about its genesis, contemporary significance, and reception<br />

is the fact that the work’s strong ties to its source text and musical models invoke a tradition<br />

of anti-militarist theater rooted in its source play. An experiment in presenting simultaneous<br />

action unfolding in different physical spaces, transgressive to the point of incurring a bitter<br />

and devastating reaction from Goethe, Jakob Michael Reinhard Lenz’s 1776 die Soldaten in<br />

turn served as a source for Büchner’s fragmentary Woyzeck, itself the source of Alban Berg’s<br />

Wozzeck, the most direct musical model for Zimmermann’s conception. This paper traces a<br />

path of transformation from Lenz to Büchner to Berg to Zimmermann, focusing on an episode<br />

that Zimmermann apparently modeled on act 1, scene 1 of Wozzeck. By strengthening<br />

the connection between his “pluralistic” opera and historical models exploring similar themes<br />

and the temporal disunity of its source play, Zimmermann extends his definition of pluralism<br />

from style into the temporal dimension, and in so doing created an artifact embodying<br />

resistance not only to militarism and the arc of German history from the “humanistic” age of<br />

Goethe and Schiller to the present, but to a facile iconoclasm that had become the dominant<br />

voice in the German musical avant-garde.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!