AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
160 saturday evening <strong>AMS</strong> <strong>Philadelphia</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />
whose father and brother had died in the concentration camps, mocked Death with the sarcasm<br />
of one who had also looked the Grim Reaper in the face. Despite the obvious differences<br />
in style and all external factors, there is an astonishing number of similarities between the two<br />
operas that I will attempt to explain by tracing the intellectual histories of the two librettos<br />
and invoking the theory of the absurd.<br />
BERND ALOIS ZIMMERMANN’S SoLdAteN, TEMPORAL<br />
PLURALISM, AND THE POLITICS OF RESISTANCE:<br />
RE-VOICING LENZ, BüCHNER, BERG<br />
Christopher Alan Williams<br />
Bowling Green State University<br />
When Bernd Alois Zimmermann’s opera die Soldaten premiered in February, 1965, it was<br />
hailed as a masterpiece of postwar modernism, and as an ideal distillation of the composer’s<br />
style, technique, and ideals, the most vivid embodiment of what he termed “musikalische<br />
Pluralismus.” But problems were also cited: the extraordinary difficulties it presented<br />
for performers, for audiences through its relentless loudness and morbid despair, and, for<br />
some <strong>American</strong> commentators, its uncomfortable fusion of serialism with “post-modern”<br />
evocations of jazz and multi-media collage techniques. From the standpoint of a German<br />
avant-garde then dominated by the pronouncements of Karlheinz Stockhausen and his circle<br />
(for <strong>American</strong> academics the most influential mouthpiece for European developments), a<br />
further problem resided in the work’s use of historical forms and “conventional” dramaturgy,<br />
which suggested a moribund dependence on tradition. Despite these many obstacles, the<br />
opera has benefited from repeated revival on both sides of the Atlantic, in at least five major<br />
productions, most recently in 2008, more than any other postwar opera not firmly rooted in<br />
the tonal tradition.<br />
Somewhat buried in debates about its genesis, contemporary significance, and reception<br />
is the fact that the work’s strong ties to its source text and musical models invoke a tradition<br />
of anti-militarist theater rooted in its source play. An experiment in presenting simultaneous<br />
action unfolding in different physical spaces, transgressive to the point of incurring a bitter<br />
and devastating reaction from Goethe, Jakob Michael Reinhard Lenz’s 1776 die Soldaten in<br />
turn served as a source for Büchner’s fragmentary Woyzeck, itself the source of Alban Berg’s<br />
Wozzeck, the most direct musical model for Zimmermann’s conception. This paper traces a<br />
path of transformation from Lenz to Büchner to Berg to Zimmermann, focusing on an episode<br />
that Zimmermann apparently modeled on act 1, scene 1 of Wozzeck. By strengthening<br />
the connection between his “pluralistic” opera and historical models exploring similar themes<br />
and the temporal disunity of its source play, Zimmermann extends his definition of pluralism<br />
from style into the temporal dimension, and in so doing created an artifact embodying<br />
resistance not only to militarism and the arc of German history from the “humanistic” age of<br />
Goethe and Schiller to the present, but to a facile iconoclasm that had become the dominant<br />
voice in the German musical avant-garde.