14.01.2013 Views

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176 sunday morning <strong>AMS</strong> <strong>Philadelphia</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

SALVe regiNA/SALVe rex CHriSte: THE LUTHERAN<br />

APPROPRIATION OF THE MARIAN ANTIPHONS IN<br />

THE ERA OF NEW PIETY (NEUE FRöMMIGKEIT)<br />

Mary E. Frandsen<br />

University of Notre Dame<br />

Between c. 1640 and 1700, musical settings of the four Marian antiphons, particularly the<br />

Salve regina, with texts that had been “de-Marianized” and re-addressed to Christ, assumed a<br />

significant presence in the Lutheran repertoire. While the practice of altering these supplicatory<br />

Marian texts to bring them into conformity with the Lutheran view of Christ as the sole<br />

mediator dates back at least to Seybald Heyden’s 1523 revision of the Salve regina (as Salve Jesu<br />

Christe, rex misericordiae), and altered texts circulated in northern hymnals into the 1560s,<br />

the most intense Lutheran engagement with these antiphons, albeit in modified form, occurred<br />

more than a century after the Reformation. In the context of a larger study on music<br />

and Lutheran devotion, I have identified nearly eighty such works, both extant and lost. The<br />

vast majority of these are revisions of the Salve regina, which required substitute phrases in<br />

just four lines, while the other three texts necessitated extensive rewriting. Examples appear<br />

in anthologies of Italian music published for the Lutheran market by Ambrosius Profe (1641,<br />

1646, 1649) and Johann Havemann (1659), in Matthias Weckmann’s manuscript anthology<br />

of sacred vocal music, Lüneburg KN 206 (c. 1647), in the Düben, Grimma, Luckau, and<br />

Bokemeyer collections, and in numerous inventories of lost collections (where they may often<br />

be identified through their title incipits). The majority of these de-Marianized pieces are<br />

motets and sacred concertos by seventeenth-century Italian Catholic composers, beginning<br />

with Monteverdi and Grandi, but a few settings of the revised texts by Lutherans (such as<br />

Capricornus) also appear.<br />

At first glance, this appropriation of settings of such cherished Catholic texts smacks of<br />

confessional politics, and suggests that Lutherans sought to present these de-Marianized pieces<br />

in public liturgies as assertions of doctrinal superiority. I will argue, however, that these<br />

works have far more to do with Lutheran spirituality than with confessionalism. As I will<br />

show, they appear as part of the musical response to a development in seventeenth-century<br />

Lutheran spiritual life known to church historians as “new piety” (neue Frömmigkeit), which<br />

was marked by the cultivation of an intense life of prayer and meditation as well as a mystically-infused<br />

devotion to Christ. During the era of new piety (c. 1620–1680), Lutherans authored<br />

hundreds of devotional manuals, prayer books, sermons, and new hymns, and also developed<br />

a considerable body of sacred art music with Christocentric devotional texts—some 700 to<br />

800 pieces—much of which they borrowed directly (without textual intervention) from the<br />

contemporary Catholic repertoire. Thus it seems that Lutherans of this era employed these<br />

de-Marianized pieces—indeed, sought them out—chiefly as musically-rendered prayers of<br />

supplication to Christ. In the broader devotional repertoire cultivated by Lutherans, these<br />

pieces offered a contrast with the settings of rapturous expressions of adoration for Christ and<br />

ardent appeals for mystical union with Him that the Lutherans also prized.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!