14.01.2013 Views

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

AMS Philadelphia 2009 Abstracts - American Musicological Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100 Friday afternoon <strong>AMS</strong> <strong>Philadelphia</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

OPPOSING THE HYBRIDS: NICOLAS NABOKOV, ALAIN<br />

DANIéLOU, AND THE MUSICAL COLD WAR<br />

Harm Langenkamp<br />

Utrecht University<br />

In the spring of 1961, Tokyo provided the stage for what was announced as “a confrontation<br />

of unprecedented breadth and significance in the history of music”: the “East-West Music<br />

Encounter.” Organized as a conference-festival, nearly a hundred composers, musicologists<br />

and music critics from Western Europe, the United States, and various parts of Asia discussed<br />

problems of cross-cultural understanding and contemporary musical life during the day, and<br />

by night reveled in high-profile performances of, among others, the New York Philharmonic,<br />

the NHK Symphony Orchestra, and prominent interpreters of Indian, Thai, Korean, and<br />

Japanese traditional music. The driving spirit behind the Encounter was Nicolas Nabokov,<br />

composer and secretary-general of the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF), a worldwide<br />

coalition of intellectuals united from across a broad political spectrum in a network of committees<br />

and institutions which had been founded in the early 1950s with the stated aim of<br />

defending artistic and intellectual freedom against totalitarian oppression, and which would<br />

be exposed in the mid-1960s as a CIA instrument designed to lure non-aligned intellectuals<br />

away from the blandishments of Soviet-style Communism.<br />

Predicated on the conviction that “the preservation of the various traditional systems of<br />

music” had become a “world problem,” the conference adopted an outline of what would<br />

become the International Institute for Comparative Music Studies. Founded in 1963—with<br />

support from the Ford Foundation—in the enclave of the “free world,” West Berlin, and led<br />

by one of Nabokov’s creative partners, the Indologist Alain Daniélou, the Institute devoted<br />

its resources to the study of “the practical means of integrating the musical achievements of<br />

Asian and African cultures into world culture” in an effort to oppose “the influence of hybrid<br />

forms of music” that (supposedly) constituted a threat to “the continuation and preservation<br />

of authentic traditions.”<br />

Based on archival research and the correspondence between Nabokov and Daniélou, this<br />

paper discusses the troublesome gestation of the Encounter and the Institute against the political<br />

background of the late 1950s and early 1960s: the global competition between the United<br />

States and the Soviet Union for the allegiance of decolonizing nations in Asia and Africa,<br />

the foundation of the Non-Aligned Movement led by India, and a wave of anti-<strong>American</strong><br />

demonstrations in Japan. The CCF’s investment in musico-cultural preservation will be interpreted<br />

as a strategy to win over the intelligentsia of what in 1952 had been coined the “Third<br />

World” for the “First World.” Subsequently, it will be argued that this strategy emerged from<br />

a general concern for what many CCF members saw as the threat of “middlebrow culture,”<br />

the type of media which emphatically encouraged accessibility and hybridization, and which<br />

was, therefore, much to the distress of Nabokov, deployed by the Eisenhower administration<br />

for its cultural diplomacy programs. By considering the various, and at times conflicting,<br />

agendas held by participants, institutions, and sponsors engaged in “East meets West” events,<br />

this study aims to contribute to the wider debate on both enabling and disabling tensions of<br />

globalization that to a large extent emanated from Cold War ideology and taste politics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!